Wrong, they are 1-50. How many times does the same info need to be repeated?MillerTime04 wrote:goldenrose wrote:Thats cool, it really would be rad to have his signature and a low number
There wont be a number , they are AP sets
Star Wars Set 10 Moss
Forum rules
• Posts in this forum should directly relate to the artist, art, or artwork.
• Do not post ISOs or FS/Ts in this forum section. Please use the Open Market section of the EB forums for all secondary (resale) market activity.
• Do not post details of your order process, shipping status, or condition upon arrival in this forum section. Please use the item's Release Discussion thread for this activity.
• Posts in this forum should directly relate to the artist, art, or artwork.
• Do not post ISOs or FS/Ts in this forum section. Please use the Open Market section of the EB forums for all secondary (resale) market activity.
• Do not post details of your order process, shipping status, or condition upon arrival in this forum section. Please use the item's Release Discussion thread for this activity.
Same fudge, different drop.
so will they be signed and numbered? I'm confusedgonzo303 wrote:Wrong, they are 1-50. How many times does the same info need to be repeated?MillerTime04 wrote:goldenrose wrote:Thats cool, it really would be rad to have his signature and a low number
There wont be a number , they are AP sets
- MillerTime04
- Art Expert
- Posts: 2701
- Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 10:25 pm
well color me wrong , was going by Olly's blog
Art comes alive in the arguments you have about it
- bloodthrust
- Art Expert
- Posts: 2280
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2007 10:01 pm
- Location: The OC brah.
yeah, cos numbers matter.goldenrose wrote:Thats cool, it really would be rad to have his signature and a low number
Perkins wrote:Hmm. Art with rules. Doesn't sound like all that great of an idea to me.
mistersmith wrote:It's Pearl Jam. You could poop on a piece of French Paper and write "Pearl Jam" in it with your finger and have a decent shot at AoTW.
I always prefer low numbers, but in this case just getting a set is enough, regardless of the number.
My Mondo Star Wars gallery: http://www.flickr.com/photos/dylansdad/ ... 054695361/
i am glad he is taking advantage of market value, but in the long run, i cant see these fetching over $300 a year from now.cerebus wrote:$500 for the set.
....or maybe i can. i really like the design on these. definitely worth more than what Mondo sold them for.
Cool set and all and I definitely was trying to get them but the resale price on these is nuts. Really just want the jedi anyway. If someone for some weird reason gets a set and wants to keep one of the others and sell the jedi hit me up.
Really? Star Wars is seriously the biggest name in movie history, why wouldn't these hold there value. I think you guys are nuts and just want the prices to drop.mattlew69 wrote:i am glad he is taking advantage of market value, but in the long run, i cant see these fetching over $300 a year from now.cerebus wrote:$500 for the set.
....or maybe i can. i really like the design on these. definitely worth more than what Mondo sold them for.
Same fudge, different drop.
- Ghotihead2001
- Art Connoisseur
- Posts: 320
- Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 12:00 am
- Location: NYC
sure we do, but its nice to know that if you sink hundreds of dollars into some paper that it will hold its value in the event you get tired of it or need funds....
this aint no party, this aint no disco
I think these have the possibility to approach Tyler Stout's work as to desirability for collectors. Iconic movies, uniqueness of the poster art and the reputation and ability of the artist making the poster. Not to mention the dearth of aftermarket Star Wars posters itself; all these factors will create a volatile combination for appreciation of value. I mean we haven't we seen what Tyler's work is going for right now? The more these sets get in the hands of collectors and not flippers or scalpers (I guess they're probably both the same) the prices will continue to rise throughout the years. Just my opinion of course.gonzo303 wrote:Really? Star Wars is seriously the biggest name in movie history, why wouldn't these hold there value. I think you guys are nuts and just want the prices to drop.mattlew69 wrote:i am glad he is taking advantage of market value, but in the long run, i cant see these fetching over $300 a year from now.cerebus wrote:$500 for the set.
....or maybe i can. i really like the design on these. definitely worth more than what Mondo sold them for.
“If we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so.”
“The Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing.” R. Mueller
“The Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing.” R. Mueller
And for the record, I purchased them because I like Star Wars, I like Olly Moss's work and so far, these are the best Star Wars posters I've ever seen. That may change however if Tyler puts out a set in the near future of these movies. Fingers crossed that that happens!my2hands wrote:does anyone actually buy art for themselves anymore?
“If we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so.”
“The Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing.” R. Mueller
“The Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing.” R. Mueller