I Came To Know An Archer 09 Danger

automator · Sat Sep 12, 2009 2:59 am

This topic is dedicated to: I Came To Know An Archer 09 Danger

Sat Sep 12, 2009 3:10 am

Sat Sep 12, 2009 8:48 am

Love this one. I'd like to see some different colours as well.

GTMaus · Sat Sep 12, 2009 10:06 am

machination wrote:Love this one. I'd like to see some different colours as well.

I missed his use of blue. Seems like forever since we got a classic blue piece from DD.

Sat Sep 12, 2009 10:35 am

GTMaus wrote:
machination wrote:Love this one. I'd like to see some different colours as well.
I missed his use of blue. Seems like forever since we got a classic blue piece from DD.

That's true. His paintings earlier this year used blue quite well. I was just thinking that a red or a black would make it more menacing.

GTMaus · Sat Sep 12, 2009 10:45 am

machination wrote:
GTMaus wrote:
machination wrote:Love this one. I'd like to see some different colours as well.
I missed his use of blue. Seems like forever since we got a classic blue piece from DD.
That's true. His paintings earlier this year used blue quite well. I was just thinking that a red or a black would make it more menacing.

Very true, didn't think of it that way. This one to me has the same feel as some of DD's classics, so I thought the blue fit it perfectly.

stereoface · Sat Sep 12, 2009 1:02 pm

I like the blue and black. The problem is that sometimes when I get them framed and up on the wall, they are so dark that the images lose something. For example, his String Cheese print.

Sat Sep 12, 2009 1:58 pm

stereoface wrote:I like the blue and black. The problem is that sometimes when I get them framed and up on the wall, they are so dark that the images lose something. For example, his String Cheese print.

Like this one:

Although, it's one my favourite prints by Danger.

stereoface · Sat Sep 12, 2009 5:56 pm

machination wrote:
stereoface wrote:I like the blue and black. The problem is that sometimes when I get them framed and up on the wall, they are so dark that the images lose something. For example, his String Cheese print.
Like this one:

Although, it's one my favourite prints by Danger.

That is exactly what I am talking about. It has actually kept me from purchasing some Dangers. Right now I have his Walkmen, Planes Mistaken for Stars, and String Cheese Incident framed on the wall. Although I am in Chicago and love the SCI image, I definitely prefer the other prints because I can actually see them.

mistersmith · Sat Sep 12, 2009 6:10 pm

Try and see them in person before writing them off. Never trust a jpeg.

And for what it's worth, Daniel's most popular print from the last year or so was "Whatever the Hell..." and that's blue/dark.

stereoface · Sat Sep 12, 2009 7:12 pm

mistersmith wrote:Try and see them in person before writing them off. Never trust a jpeg.

And for what it's worth, Daniel's most popular print from the last year or so was "Whatever the Hell..." and that's blue/dark.

I am not trying to criticize DD's work. To the contrary, I am a big fan of his. I have also seen most of his work in person as recently as Flatstock in Chicago. My only point is that I wish the black and blue was easier to see when I hang it up in my room.

automator · Fri Oct 09, 2009 9:22 pm

New image I Came To Know An Archer 09 Danger

shyofnormal · Sun Oct 11, 2009 6:13 pm

so is there any difference between the artist and g1988 editions? are they numbered separately?

Sun Oct 11, 2009 6:24 pm

shyofnormal wrote:so is there any difference between the artist and g1988 editions? are they numbered separately?

since the gallery claimed theirs are 3rd out of 15, I think it's a safe bet.
possible that Daniel's wont be hand embelished?

mcnail · Sun Oct 11, 2009 6:48 pm

shyofnormal wrote:so is there any difference between the artist and g1988 editions? are they numbered separately?

no. yes.