Art discussion forum.
fluffhead13 wrote:I'm kind of surprised at the lack of interest in this print. I think that once Ben is done with it, we'll all be amazed.
damnit....you talked me into it.bangyman wrote:
hey thanks!
i am done with it. it looks super-awesome. super-tiny details.
and once again i'll say....dont judge a print by a jpeg. the colors look so rich on this thing in person. all sepia-y like it was made in 1903.
and really....$75 for an 8 color, pretty limited silk screened art print is very fair, considering what some people pay for giclees.
lol, i have no self control.
no hesitation here. thanks for the info Ben. and thanks for another great print job. i'm really looking forward to it.bangyman wrote:fluffhead13 wrote:I'm kind of surprised at the lack of interest in this print. I think that once Ben is done with it, we'll all be amazed.
hey thanks!
i am done with it. it looks super-awesome. super-tiny details.
and once again i'll say....dont judge a print by a jpeg. the colors look so rich on this thing in person. all sepia-y like it was made in 1903.
and really....$75 for an 8 color, pretty limited silk screened art print is very fair, considering what some people pay for giclees.
Looking forward to seeing this baby in person. lol sounds familiar. For future reference....if you're trying to talk yourself OUT of buying a print, it's probably not a good idea to be refreshing the on sale page.dr_flie wrote:Well.. lost my balance and as I was falling off the fence, I hit the buy button on the way down..
It's the first Horkey I'm passing on in a long time. I have to torture myself a little. If it were practical to do so I'd have snatched it up for sure. Stupid rent and food are really clogging up my operation.greenhorn1 wrote:lol sounds familiar. For future reference....if you're trying to talk yourself OUT of buying a print, it's probably not a good idea to be refreshing the on sale page.dr_flie wrote:Well.. lost my balance and as I was falling off the fence, I hit the buy button on the way down..
