finneganm wrote:When I strip down on the weekends, cover myself in mayonnaise and roll around in croutons, am I a sandwich?
Mondo Poster News & Rumors
- RambosRemodeler
- Art Freak
- Posts: 18172
- Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2012 5:35 pm
choke wrote:I won't give up a flip that I can get myself to someone who is convinced they need it. None of us need any of this fudge. It's art. It's not medicine.
full-real-lol. x2, because I read it in the POTD thread first.finneganm wrote:When I strip down on the weekends, cover myself in mayonnaise and roll around in croutons, am I a sandwich?
_____________
RambosRemodeler wrote:.........You're entitled to your opinion but it's wrong.
Kramerica wrote: . . . . . Also, never listen to anything rambo says.
Probs closer to a poor mans Caesar Saladfinneganm wrote:When I strip down on the weekends, cover myself in mayonnaise and roll around in croutons, am I a sandwich?
-
- Art Enthusiast
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2018 2:42 pm
you could say the same about tyler stout. a lot of his prints are cobbled together series of existing images. I don't understand why so many people in the community clown artists for using screenshots when an artist they like do it don't say anythingrubberneck wrote:Apparently artist had a bit of a whine about it on FB. Until he realized his was actually unlicensed and reminded his own Harry Potter print was a cobbled together series of existing images, called out prior on FB.RambosRemodeler wrote:Kevin Wilson sucks. Pcc drymounting rules.FloB wrote:Nice, but not really a new concept. Done by Kevin M.Wilson in 2017...
Plus who gives a fudge. None of this stuff is original
Post since deleted. Serious business this art.
- RambosRemodeler
- Art Freak
- Posts: 18172
- Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2012 5:35 pm
andrewg520 wrote:you could say the same about tyler stout. a lot of his prints are cobbled together series of existing images. I don't understand why so many people in the community clown artists for using screenshots when an artist they like do it don't say anythingrubberneck wrote:
Apparently artist had a bit of a whine about it on FB. Until he realized his was actually unlicensed and reminded his own Harry Potter print was a cobbled together series of existing images, called out prior on FB.
Post since deleted. Serious business this art.
NICE TRY KEVIN
choke wrote:I won't give up a flip that I can get myself to someone who is convinced they need it. None of us need any of this fudge. It's art. It's not medicine.
- wonkabars7
- Art Expert
- Posts: 7287
- Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 2:13 pm
kinda.SPAC04 wrote:not really