Phish Great Went Walking Fish Limestone 97 Pollock
Forum rules
• Posts in this forum should directly relate to the artist, art, or artwork.
• Do not post ISOs or FS/Ts in this forum section. Please use the Open Market section of the EB forums for all secondary (resale) market activity.
• Do not post details of your order process, shipping status, or condition upon arrival in this forum section. Please use the item's Release Discussion thread for this activity.
• Posts in this forum should directly relate to the artist, art, or artwork.
• Do not post ISOs or FS/Ts in this forum section. Please use the Open Market section of the EB forums for all secondary (resale) market activity.
• Do not post details of your order process, shipping status, or condition upon arrival in this forum section. Please use the item's Release Discussion thread for this activity.
- sideshowbob
- EB Team
- Posts: 1712
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 12:00 am
- Location: Maryland
Fixed. That sale has already been added.flux3000 wrote:Mods - cleanup needed in the recent sales. Khanefeld seems to have listed his sale three times. And it has a strange number, "3rd artist".
I submitted the original sale of this print for the seller, khanefeld. The edition information is correct.
Not necessarily. There is actually a #22 print, there is also a high res scan that circulated of the print. The one that popped up on ebay a while back was clearly a print out of the scan.Dalek wrote:Just for the record, as I'm sure most people know by now, 22/100 walking fish is a fake.
- phishstix101
- Art Expert
- Posts: 6368
- Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 1:00 am
-
- Member
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 3:17 pm
phishstix101 wrote:http://www.ebay.com/itm/3-The-Walking-P ... 43de530f32
so this listing was selling 3 of the fish- bold. Too weird to be fake right? like- who would do that?
Then he listed just 1 of them later that didnt sell.
The interesting part is that #77 was one of his- #75, 76, 77
But EB has #77 selling in '06
-
- Member
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 3:17 pm
I contacted and asked them about itfinneganm wrote:usually not a good sign...TranquilandSerene wrote:
But EB has #77 selling in '06
They were adamant that the one from '06 isn't real. That they know other print makers, and Jim through them......
seemed pretty earnest.
They said they sold #77 privately to a person in Utah.
Really nice communication, they want to be transparent- just interesting. Sometimes truth is stranger than fiction?
- danielpmcauliffe
- Art Connoisseur
- Posts: 908
- Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2014 12:29 am
- Location: Salt Lake City, UT
I bet I know who that person is. I could contact him and see if it's real.TranquilandSerene wrote:I contacted and asked them about itfinneganm wrote:usually not a good sign...TranquilandSerene wrote:
But EB has #77 selling in '06
They were adamant that the one from '06 isn't real. That they know other print makers, and Jim through them......
seemed pretty earnest.
They said they sold #77 privately to a person in Utah.
Really nice communication, they want to be transparent- just interesting. Sometimes truth is stranger than fiction?
#22 was originally mine. The reason the high quality scan circulates is because I made it to show to the buyer. I had to sell it at the time to pay for my dads funeral. I miss it...and my Dad.
I obtained the print from Jim inside a giant plywood block of cheese at the Went. Jim was set up inside printing them by hand right there and then and hanging them on a clothes line with clothespins to dry. He printed mine. Hung it up. It began to drizzle. He wrapped it in wax paper for me and put it in a manila envelope. I stored it flat for years before I had to sell it. At the time I sold it I got $5,500 for it. Wish I had the disposable income to get it back.
I obtained the print from Jim inside a giant plywood block of cheese at the Went. Jim was set up inside printing them by hand right there and then and hanging them on a clothes line with clothespins to dry. He printed mine. Hung it up. It began to drizzle. He wrapped it in wax paper for me and put it in a manila envelope. I stored it flat for years before I had to sell it. At the time I sold it I got $5,500 for it. Wish I had the disposable income to get it back.