General art-related discussion.
-
jjttdw
- Art Expert
- Posts: 7843
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 11:45 pm
Thu Jul 06, 2017 10:04 am
charter wrote:
If you're gonna pull your dick out and try to show off, you better make sure your math is right before people point and laugh and you blame it on the "cold".
$450 + $25 shipping = $475. Not $500.
Only an idiot would sell this on eBay for $600. BUT, take your scenario and you make out with $47 for 15 seconds of work. I'll take it? OR, hold onto it for a year and sell for $1k like the other flag.
I thought the price was $475 instead of $450 so feel free to point and laugh at that. As far as only idiots selling at $600, stuff like that happens all the time (see MBW King or Hitchcock prints). I agree that it will do nicely in year or so assuming he doesn't recycle some version of the image.
NEWPORTS69 wrote:ive kept journal for very long time and ranked public restrooms because i srs hate using them, was working on an app but im not very smart
-
SteveKai
- Art Expert
- Posts: 1819
- Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 4:54 am
Thu Jul 06, 2017 11:07 pm
duckyhoward wrote: When making a lazy $273K is not enough - lets flog the dead horse
(sorry marilyn) a bit more and make an extra $48K .
Always wondered how licensing works with a print that has Marilyn, Elvis, Ali etc faces on it. Does anyone know if MBW would have to have a licensing agreement with the applicable estates?
-
fredo
- Art God
- Posts: 27660
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 7:26 pm
- Location: ENZEE
Thu Jul 06, 2017 11:58 pm
I imagine fair use comes into play. Helluva stretch though applying it to mbw's halfassed gulag. Assume they'll be selling through Target once the "art" sham is no longer bought by the monied.
just a foil for me today, thanks
-
pvecchi
- Art Expert
- Posts: 1759
- Joined: Thu May 29, 2003 12:00 am
Sun Jul 16, 2017 10:10 pm
fribhey wrote:SteveKai wrote:duckyhoward wrote: When making a lazy $273K is not enough - lets flog the dead horse
(sorry marilyn) a bit more and make an extra $48K .
Always wondered how licensing works with a print that has Marilyn, Elvis, Ali etc faces on it. Does anyone know if MBW would have to have a licensing agreement with the applicable estates?
ironically, MBW tried suing the Life is Beautiful festival in Las Vegas for copyright/trademark infringement and was not successful in doing so
http://cdas.com/life-is-beautiful/
and the company that puts on that festival is now seeking nearly $2 million dollars in fees from MBW since his suit was thrown out in court by a judge:
https://www.law360.com/articles/879378/ ... -in-tm-row
LOL...maybe there is a little cosmic justice out there after all....
Was wondering what was up with all his recent releases....figured that clown would take the money and run.....someone smarter would anyway
-
WaltJocketty
- Art Connoisseur
- Posts: 231
- Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 2:00 am
Mon Jul 17, 2017 8:39 pm
Anybody with $50 can file a lawsuit. That doesn't mean they have a legal argument. I think these types of lawsuits are typically decided less on the facts than they are on on the judge/venue.
When Google won the lawsuit allowing them to profit from and claim ownership of essentially every book on the planet by scanning the books electronically, that made a lot of people who make a living by ripping off other people's ideas very very happy.
-
WaltJocketty
- Art Connoisseur
- Posts: 231
- Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 2:00 am
Mon Jul 17, 2017 9:36 pm
fredo wrote:Lels.
It's "transformative". Even just copying a photo and writing something like "lels" on it would constitute "fair use".