Calvin & Hobbes: The Downhill 16 Thomas
Forum rules
• Posts in this forum should directly relate to the artist, art, or artwork.
• Do not post ISOs or FS/Ts in this forum section. Please use the Open Market section of the EB forums for all secondary (resale) market activity.
• Do not post details of your order process, shipping status, or condition upon arrival in this forum section. Please use the item's Release Discussion thread for this activity.
• Posts in this forum should directly relate to the artist, art, or artwork.
• Do not post ISOs or FS/Ts in this forum section. Please use the Open Market section of the EB forums for all secondary (resale) market activity.
• Do not post details of your order process, shipping status, or condition upon arrival in this forum section. Please use the item's Release Discussion thread for this activity.
I make distinctions in my willful appropriation of other people's IP, I fully admit that. Waterson has been very outspoken on his distaste and I respect him enough to abide by his wishes. Plus, this is just a complete ripoff of an image. It lacks any kind of artistic interpretation.
When I'm done ranting about elite power that rules the planet under a totalitarian government that uses the media to keep people stupid, my throat gets parched. That's why I drink Orange Drink. - BH
There's something off about the sense of movement in this piece. I'm curious to see if it was originally drawn that way. Depicting movement is one of Watterson's strong points.haven wrote:Out of general curiosity, did the "artist" draw this or is it just a straight reproduction of a Watterson image?
strongstuff wrote: i want to watch those fools squirm.
Buy some unlicensed art or gig posters/street art that uses copywritten images?treweman wrote:MoviePosterEmpire ... Where's my public floggng? I feel cheated.
- RambosRemodeler
- Art Freak
- Posts: 18172
- Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2012 5:35 pm
chalkdust wrote:don't you have a Doyle thread to be trolling somewhere?
Nah this fudge is right up his alley. He probably bought 10
choke wrote:I won't give up a flip that I can get myself to someone who is convinced they need it. None of us need any of this fudge. It's art. It's not medicine.
- nomdeguerre
- Art Connoisseur
- Posts: 258
- Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2015 9:17 pm
- Location: the land of lost dreams
MoviePosterEmpire wrote:comountaingolf: You own a bootleg "Life Aquatic" piece, "Creature" peek, "Pulp Fiction," "Jackie Brown," "Dazed and Confused"...
biscocrack420: That Pez piece uses Donald Duck's likeness without rights, same with the Primus with "Wonka." What about the "Family Guy" trio of prints? The sixstringer "Breaking Bad" piece? Godmachine "Hellboy?" "Tetsuo Wins?" The Rogues' Gallery Set? NC Winters's turtles? I could keep going on the unlicensed stuff you've bought.
Are you trying to justify your blatant theft by saying "it's ok because other people do it"?
What's next, murder and rape?
*hand censored by the magical m'faith
My comments are in no way an endorsement or a comdennation of the practice of producing unlicensed art. I'm merely pointing out the hypocrisy of select individuals railing against this piece when they are looking to acquire or have already acquired art with unlicensed elements. You can't call out thieves when you yourself are stealing or aiding after the fact.
Also, I have no dog in this fight as I don't own or plan to own a copy of this piece.
Also, I have no dog in this fight as I don't own or plan to own a copy of this piece.
Does your alt love Tim Doyle as much as you do MoviePosterEmpire? Nice delete post actionTheGreatGazoo wrote:My comments are in no way an endorsement or a comdennation of the practice of producing unlicensed art. I'm merely pointing out the hypocrisy of select individuals railing against this piece when they are looking to acquire or have already acquired art with unlicensed elements. You can't call out thieves when you yourself are stealing or aiding after the fact.
Also, I have no dog in this fight as I don't own or plan to own a copy of this piece.
Last edited by Apollo on Sat Feb 13, 2016 3:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I didn't post those words under that account. Good changing the subject.Apollo wrote:Does your alt love Tim Doyle as much as you do MoviePosterEmpire? Nice delete post actionTheGreatGazoo wrote:My comments are in no way an endorsement or a comdennation of the practice of producing unlicensed art. I'm merely pointing out the hypocrisy of select individuals railing against this piece when they are looking to acquire or have already acquired art with unlicensed elements. You can't call out thieves when you yourself are stealing or aiding after the fact.
Also, I have no dog in this fight as I don't own or plan to own a copy of this piece.
You did post essentially the same thing without realizing you were logged into that account and then deleted your post. So you're implying you have more than two accounts then?MoviePosterEmpire wrote:I didn't post those words under that account. Good changing the subject.Apollo wrote:Does your alt love Tim Doyle as much as you do MoviePosterEmpire? Nice delete post actionTheGreatGazoo wrote:My comments are in no way an endorsement or a comdennation of the practice of producing unlicensed art. I'm merely pointing out the hypocrisy of select individuals railing against this piece when they are looking to acquire or have already acquired art with unlicensed elements. You can't call out thieves when you yourself are stealing or aiding after the fact.
Also, I have no dog in this fight as I don't own or plan to own a copy of this piece.
- nomdeguerre
- Art Connoisseur
- Posts: 258
- Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2015 9:17 pm
- Location: the land of lost dreams
Wait.MoviePosterEmpire wrote:I didn't post those words under that account. Good changing the subject.Apollo wrote:Does your alt love Tim Doyle as much as you do MoviePosterEmpire? Nice delete post actionTheGreatGazoo wrote:My comments are in no way an endorsement or a comdennation of the practice of producing unlicensed art. I'm merely pointing out the hypocrisy of select individuals railing against this piece when they are looking to acquire or have already acquired art with unlicensed elements. You can't call out thieves when you yourself are stealing or aiding after the fact.
Also, I have no dog in this fight as I don't own or plan to own a copy of this piece.
Wait.
WAIT!
Can I make an alternate account and be deadpool? Might be fun to insult myself?
*hand censored by the magical m'faith