The Starlet 16 Sperry
Forum rules
• Posts in this forum should directly relate to the artist, art, or artwork.
• Do not post ISOs or FS/Ts in this forum section. Please use the Open Market section of the EB forums for all secondary (resale) market activity.
• Do not post details of your order process, shipping status, or condition upon arrival in this forum section. Please use the item's Release Discussion thread for this activity.
• Posts in this forum should directly relate to the artist, art, or artwork.
• Do not post ISOs or FS/Ts in this forum section. Please use the Open Market section of the EB forums for all secondary (resale) market activity.
• Do not post details of your order process, shipping status, or condition upon arrival in this forum section. Please use the item's Release Discussion thread for this activity.
There is another release with a ? up this week - how cool might that be?!!!Hippie wrote:I disagree, and clearly it's SJ.
Also, I'm going to guess its part of a diptych, with the second HCG print from Sperry coming later this week.
-
nevadinova
- Art Expert
- Posts: 1121
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2004 2:00 am
Agreed.Hippie wrote:I disagree, and clearly it's SJ.
Also, I'm going to guess its part of a diptych, with the second HCG print from Sperry coming later this week.
-
earlgreytoast
- Art Expert
- Posts: 9368
- Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 1:14 pm
Anyone who doesn't think this looks like Scarjo should just move on to collecting photographs and not screen prints. This isn't the hobby for you.
My issue with the print, and this applies to most of squirt's movie prints, is that it is simply a representation of a character in the movie. I haven't seen this movie yet obvi but what is it about this scene that represents the movie other than the fact that it's Scarlet looking perky and cute in a screen shot? Aside from the excitement I get when looking at a Sperry and an exquisitely executed serigraph, it's just boring. If Chuck could marry his immeasurable talents with a more cerebral take on a movie, the sky would be the limit.
My issue with the print, and this applies to most of squirt's movie prints, is that it is simply a representation of a character in the movie. I haven't seen this movie yet obvi but what is it about this scene that represents the movie other than the fact that it's Scarlet looking perky and cute in a screen shot? Aside from the excitement I get when looking at a Sperry and an exquisitely executed serigraph, it's just boring. If Chuck could marry his immeasurable talents with a more cerebral take on a movie, the sky would be the limit.
Codeblue wrote: I’m sorry for everything.
-
allyouzombies
- Art Connoisseur
- Posts: 598
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2014 5:49 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
I agree with you, but I still love the print. Evokes film noir posters from the 1940s.earlgreytoast wrote:Anyone who doesn't think this looks like Scarjo should just move on to collecting photographs and not screen prints. This isn't the hobby for you.
My issue with the print, and this applies to most of squirt's movie prints, is that it is simply a representation of a character in the movie. I haven't seen this movie yet obvi but what is it about this scene that represents the movie other than the fact that it's Scarlet looking perky and cute in a screen shot? Aside from the excitement I get when looking at a Sperry and an exquisitely executed serigraph, it's just boring. If Chuck could marry his immeasurable talents with a more cerebral take on a movie, the sky would be the limit.
-
idealposters
- Art Connoisseur
- Posts: 200
- Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 12:00 am
- Contact:
you guys are drymounting funny. collector speculation always cracks me up.
also, "this is awful...". really? i had an entire diatribe ready here but what's the point? can't please everyone. instead, i'll just post, SMH. lol.
also, "this is awful...". really? i had an entire diatribe ready here but what's the point? can't please everyone. instead, i'll just post, SMH. lol.
We want the diatribe!idealposters wrote:you guys are drymounting funny. collector speculation always cracks me up.
also, "this is awful...". really? i had an entire diatribe ready here but what's the point? can't please everyone. instead, i'll just post, SMH. lol.
RupertPupkin wrote:I live by this rule and this rule alone: people are drymounting idiots.
