Why? Too grainy?earlgreytoast wrote:Got mine. Underwhelmed.
The Map Room 14 Richard
Forum rules
• Posts in this forum should directly relate to the artist, art, or artwork.
• Do not post ISOs or FS/Ts in this forum section. Please use the Open Market section of the EB forums for all secondary (resale) market activity.
• Do not post details of your order process, shipping status, or condition upon arrival in this forum section. Please use the item's Release Discussion thread for this activity.
• Posts in this forum should directly relate to the artist, art, or artwork.
• Do not post ISOs or FS/Ts in this forum section. Please use the Open Market section of the EB forums for all secondary (resale) market activity.
• Do not post details of your order process, shipping status, or condition upon arrival in this forum section. Please use the item's Release Discussion thread for this activity.
-
earlgreytoast
- Art Expert
- Posts: 9368
- Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 1:14 pm
I guess that's one way to describe it. It just lacks detail, especially the background wall. And in person, the composition doesn't work for me; almost the entire left side of the print has nothing going on. You could chop off 10" on the left and lose nothing. Also, there is no "pop" from the streak of light and where it hits the city. Those spots should be BRIGHT and it's just...meh.Count wrote:Why? Too grainy?earlgreytoast wrote:Got mine. Underwhelmed.
Codeblue wrote: I’m sorry for everything.
-
wonkabars7
- Art Expert
- Posts: 7287
- Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 2:13 pm
Fair assessment to be sure.earlgreytoast wrote:I guess that's one way to describe it. It just lacks detail, especially the background wall. And in person, the composition doesn't work for me; almost the entire left side of the print has nothing going on. You could chop off 10" on the left and lose nothing. Also, there is no "pop" from the streak of light and where it hits the city. Those spots should be BRIGHT and it's just...meh.Count wrote:Why? Too grainy?earlgreytoast wrote:Got mine. Underwhelmed.
It works for me personally. The empty space on the left seems fitting, as it shows the void/space/mystery of the map room...I like how isolated Indy appears because of this. High stakes.
Agree with the light.
I had thoughts of having this, Fortress of Solitude, and Englert's Tatooine print all framed together, vertically...these three basically sum up my childhood. I think together, and from a distance, it would work better than on its own and up close.
You mean like thisearlgreytoast wrote:I guess that's one way to describe it. It just lacks detail, especially the background wall. And in person, the composition doesn't work for me; almost the entire left side of the print has nothing going on. You could chop off 10" on the left and lose nothing. Also, there is no "pop" from the streak of light and where it hits the city. Those spots should be BRIGHT and it's just...meh.Count wrote:Why? Too grainy?earlgreytoast wrote:Got mine. Underwhelmed.
Ask about getting the AP version added here:
http://forum.expressobeans.com/viewtopi ... start=5745
Anyone know what the run on the AP version is?
So I'm curious if he slipped R2/3PO onto the wall somewhere? Also I really like that Tanis/Gold version...
http://forum.expressobeans.com/viewtopi ... start=5745
Anyone know what the run on the AP version is?
So I'm curious if he slipped R2/3PO onto the wall somewhere? Also I really like that Tanis/Gold version...