The Art of Jason Edmiston
- dasponyboy
- Art Expert
- Posts: 5363
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 3:47 pm
- Location: THE ILL
He coulda had a run of 200 and charged that.
- Scottjohnston
- Art Expert
- Posts: 2535
- Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2012 10:46 pm
coborjobs2010 wrote:This is probably one of my all time favorite posters, but may just have to go for the Mitchell portrait instead. Luckily that's timed until after this goes on sale. $150 and edition of 70? Yikes
A lot of orange in here
- blingaling
- Art Expert
- Posts: 1284
- Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2013 12:38 pm
- Location: OKC
- Contact:
Yep. Def in line with P&T pricing, and well under current market value.Kramerica wrote:I think the price is great. Especially considering the edition size and market value of the reg.
- JasonBourne
- Art Connoisseur
- Posts: 384
- Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2013 9:41 pm
Start rant\
Seriously, I dont understand the moaning on the prices. So an artist pockets a fair market value on his work & values it as such and everyone complains yet everyone who really badly wants the print at some point or another pays the flipper market out there anyways. Why not give the money to the artist instead who created the art for your consumption and support them. Flipping's a part of the game, I get it and most of you get it, so whats wrong with the artist "flipping" and getting paid?
Its like the recent Daniel Danger drop, read some comments from people whining about his prints being $80 at release... seriously what the drymount?
End rant/
Seriously, I dont understand the moaning on the prices. So an artist pockets a fair market value on his work & values it as such and everyone complains yet everyone who really badly wants the print at some point or another pays the flipper market out there anyways. Why not give the money to the artist instead who created the art for your consumption and support them. Flipping's a part of the game, I get it and most of you get it, so whats wrong with the artist "flipping" and getting paid?
Its like the recent Daniel Danger drop, read some comments from people whining about his prints being $80 at release... seriously what the drymount?
End rant/
-
- Art Expert
- Posts: 3967
- Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2015 2:54 am
Cuz now the flippers gotta expect an even higher value so they can get that profit. Maybe the price will scare off a few?
EDIT: this is not an attack on flippers. I flip fudge. Just not posters. #NoDropLuck (so far)
EDIT: this is not an attack on flippers. I flip fudge. Just not posters. #NoDropLuck (so far)
Last edited by Diabolos80 on Wed Oct 28, 2015 8:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- RambosRemodeler
- Art Freak
- Posts: 18172
- Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2012 5:35 pm
Love the print, the price point and the edition size. I'm glad more money is going to Jason
choke wrote:I won't give up a flip that I can get myself to someone who is convinced they need it. None of us need any of this fudge. It's art. It's not medicine.
RambosRemodeler wrote:Love the print, the price point and the edition size. I'm glad more money is going to Jason
- SnakeEyes75
- Art Connoisseur
- Posts: 266
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2015 7:13 am
Yeah the demand seems to more than support his price, and yeah I'd much rather give it to him, I have the reg but like his variant better, I'll try for itJasonBourne wrote:Start rant\
Seriously, I dont understand the moaning on the prices. So an artist pockets a fair market value on his work & values it as such and everyone complains yet everyone who really badly wants the print at some point or another pays the flipper market out there anyways. Why not give the money to the artist instead who created the art for your consumption and support them. Flipping's a part of the game, I get it and most of you get it, so whats wrong with the artist "flipping" and getting paid?
Its like the recent Daniel Danger drop, read some comments from people whining about his prints being $80 at release... seriously what the drymount?
End rant/
The lowest price sold according to here is like $172. So...yeah, probably a fair price.
Anyway, such an in-your-face poster...would love to see somebody frame and hang it in a closet. Especially somebody married.
Anyway, such an in-your-face poster...would love to see somebody frame and hang it in a closet. Especially somebody married.
35mmpaul wrote:We are addicted to things that hurt our butts.
- RambosRemodeler
- Art Freak
- Posts: 18172
- Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2012 5:35 pm
Challenge acceptedjkw3000 wrote:The lowest price sold according to here is like $172. So...yeah, probably a fair price.
Anyway, such an in-your-face poster...would love to see somebody frame and hang it in a closet. Especially somebody married.
choke wrote:I won't give up a flip that I can get myself to someone who is convinced they need it. None of us need any of this fudge. It's art. It's not medicine.
fyi, im not complaining. i have no problem with Jason (or anyone else) doing their drops this way. im just not down for it.phips wrote:Wow. Thats an expensive piece of paper.
Gonna have to rethink this drop
I've never paid triple digits for a piece of paper (and that includes shipping). imo, and no offense to the artists, none of the screen prints/giclees that im interested in are worth that high of a price. its why my collection is tiny and i virtually never buy anything on the aftermarket. regardless of how much i like/want a print i won't overpay for it.
it's just my philosophy and because im cheap.
- tenaciousjack
- Art Expert
- Posts: 2884
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 4:06 pm
The price is more than fair for the variant.
A small run of 70 with preferred colors for $175 while a reg with a run of 300 is going for $200+ on ebay.
A small run of 70 with preferred colors for $175 while a reg with a run of 300 is going for $200+ on ebay.