James Jean News and Releases
- 666ways2love
- Art Connoisseur
- Posts: 312
- Joined: Fri Mar 19, 2010 11:19 pm
going to have to think this one over. Like the image. But yeah, tis small.
- RambosRemodeler
- Art Freak
- Posts: 18172
- Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2012 5:35 pm
This is what I was hoping it wasCragars wrote:There was another painting he posted that requires an obnoxiously large print. I wish he'd do that one. This one:
choke wrote:I won't give up a flip that I can get myself to someone who is convinced they need it. None of us need any of this fudge. It's art. It's not medicine.
-
- Art Connoisseur
- Posts: 146
- Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2014 1:19 am
- Location: Splendid Isolation
I was hoping for 'Samurai' myself - but I knew that was at long odds.
Ah well.
Ah well.
Four hit combo.mfaith wrote:SameRambosRemodeler wrote:This is what I was hoping it wasCragars wrote:There was another painting he posted that requires an obnoxiously large print. I wish he'd do that one. This one:
It's still a nice image that he picked, I'm just a big fan of his more colorful pieces. That's just my weirdness though.
35mmpaul wrote:We are addicted to things that hurt our butts.
I can't wait for this, that pic sold me too, I can't wait for thiseseffinga wrote:That is just gorgeous.
Damn. Yeah on the fence about the print this weekend.Cragars wrote:There was another painting he posted that requires an obnoxiously large print. I wish he'd do that one. This one:
Yeah, the original illustration from 2013 was 5" x 8". So, it's near 1:1dsanacore wrote:Image size: 8 ⅜″ tall × 6 ¼″ wide
It's so ridiculously tiny (That's what she said)
http://theartillerist.com/illustration/new-james-jean/
So it goes...