Stout Discussion - fmr: tyler stout posters are going insane
After looking at the image that has the poster laying flat on the table, I am certain that the poster is a mere repurposing of the vinyl artwork. It looks intentionally square at the top like so many have pointed or photoshopped out.
There is virtually no integration of the artwork into the title treatment. Generally even when he "stamps" on the text, he figures out some accent or something to tie it back into the artwork. I would have expected a tail or finger interacting with the title. It just doesn't look like "his take" on a rectangular composition. There is plenty of quality linework as expected but this is the first time where it doesn't feel like it is his complete take on the given canvas.
Maybe I am wrong.
There is virtually no integration of the artwork into the title treatment. Generally even when he "stamps" on the text, he figures out some accent or something to tie it back into the artwork. I would have expected a tail or finger interacting with the title. It just doesn't look like "his take" on a rectangular composition. There is plenty of quality linework as expected but this is the first time where it doesn't feel like it is his complete take on the given canvas.
Maybe I am wrong.
Can be an online release PB when I am not trying to get the piece if I am available. Just ask.
#1 ISO's: (Stout - Signed "Reservoir Dogs", Taylor - "Drive" & Mitchell - Signed "Driver" Portrait)
#1 ISO's: (Stout - Signed "Reservoir Dogs", Taylor - "Drive" & Mitchell - Signed "Driver" Portrait)
- maddoghoek100
- Art Expert
- Posts: 2901
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 1:03 am
- Location: NYC
short memory, it is the same shenanagans they pulled with Drive and that was only 2 years ago. This was obviously always intended to be the album cover. The date is wrong on the poster because the date was always an afterthought. Now the upside is that tyler had the drive 2 up his sleeve, so there is hope that he has the real poster somewhere and it is yet to be released.
nsd wrote:After looking at the image that has the poster laying flat on the table, I am certain that the poster is a mere repurposing of the vinyl artwork. It looks intentionally square at the top like so many have pointed or photoshopped out... There is plenty of quality linework as expected but this is the first time where it doesn't feel like it is his complete take on the given canvas.
Maybe I am wrong.
The portrait still got screwed too tho. While the cityscape was mostly just boring LA, at least it was more interesting than that space being taken up by a huge and ugly title.maddoghoek100 wrote:short memory, it is the same shenanagans they pulled with Drive and that was only 2 years ago. This was obviously always intended to be the album cover. The date is wrong on the poster because the date was always an afterthought. Now the upside is that tyler had the drive 2 up his sleeve, so there is hope that he has the real poster somewhere and it is yet to be released.
When I was at the show, and I was picking which I would take, the question wasn't "which is better?" but "which sucks less?"...
Still chose the portait cuz I love the Goz but the vinyl had the right idea. Somewhere there is a good poster made out of the cityscape and portrait.
TLDR I wish the vinyl would be the product more compromised than the poster but whatevssss Mondo really wants UO record buyer monehhh.
- maddoghoek100
- Art Expert
- Posts: 2901
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 1:03 am
- Location: NYC
it is not so much a like vs dont like. i believe he was asked to do an album cover. he did an album cover, and was then asked to convert that album cover into a poster. perhaps he was more successful re-purposing an album cover for use in a poster with drive than with alien. Ultimately the album cover is likely more successful than the movie poster, even if you like the poster
Guardians of the galaxy i believe was a movie poster that they turned into an album cover, as such it is successful as a movie poster, and also happens to be successful as an album cover (although did others notice the construction on these seems to be cheaper than some of the past album covers)
Guardians of the galaxy i believe was a movie poster that they turned into an album cover, as such it is successful as a movie poster, and also happens to be successful as an album cover (although did others notice the construction on these seems to be cheaper than some of the past album covers)
mobius006 wrote:Really is to each their own.. I really love the LA of the drive print.
- actorinthisplay
- Art Expert
- Posts: 2149
- Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2008 1:58 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
I love me some Stout as much as the next guy but this really isn't very good for his standards. I wouldn't ever buy it simply because I don't care about Alien but even if I did, there are way better Alien posters out there.
- DaleCooper
- Art Expert
- Posts: 3659
- Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2010 4:19 am
- Location: Nottingham
There's a handbill set for The Thing. He sold a limited number in 2010 (I think) and has been sending the odd one out with orders since.Samk89 wrote:Just got these in the post from Tyler himself. Any idea if this handbill is new or something? Swear I haven't seen it before unless its old? LOVE it either way What a guy!
This was they first time they screenprinted an album cover. So I'm sure that has something to do with itmaddoghoek100 wrote:(although did others notice the construction on these seems to be cheaper than some of the past album covers)
Kramerica wrote:never listen to anything rambo says.
RambosRemodeler wrote:You're entitled to your opinion but it's wrong.
-
- Art Connoisseur
- Posts: 194
- Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2014 4:30 pm
the term "no offense" usually means you are about to express an opinion that makes you seem like a douche.fantasticninja wrote:No offense but I wouldn't live in Austin if my rent was free and I lived in walking distance to Mondo.Timbrh2001 wrote:Told ya u guys don't need to be jelly of those living in Austin...