electrachrome wrote:jojobadass wrote:OG of the year is pretty dumb as 99.9% of people will never see any of the OG's in person.
But, I dig the seperate art print vs. poster idea.
well, I wouldn't exactly say dumb... but I do agree...
electrachrome wrote:jojobadass wrote:OG of the year is pretty dumb as 99.9% of people will never see any of the OG's in person.
But, I dig the seperate art print vs. poster idea.
electrachrome wrote:jojobadass wrote:OG of the year is pretty dumb as 99.9% of people will never see any of the OG's in person.
But, I dig the seperate art print vs. poster idea.
ill give ya 3 good reasons why i agree with thisgordo55 wrote:electrachrome wrote:jojobadass wrote:OG of the year is pretty dumb as 99.9% of people will never see any of the OG's in person.
But, I dig the seperate art print vs. poster idea.
DITTO!
http://www.GRAFantasy.com27 wrote: One time i was walking down the tracks when i was 4 yrs old and this train raped me in my butt.
No you're dumb! But ya that makes sense. Although your percentage might be a bit off if it was a piece in a prominent art show. Keep in mind that most likely approximately 4% of the active people will "see" the art of the year winner first hand (assuming every copy is owned by an EB member) if the print is a run of 250 (excluding variants) like last year's winner. Or something to that effect.jojobadass wrote:OG of the year is pretty dumb as 99.9% of people will never see any of the OG's in person.
still a few loose ends to work out.bysleightofhand wrote:I know its way way way early, but any progress on separating the gig and art print categories this year?
Topic hasn't really been getting attention in the interest of overall site and forums structure. It is in the back of my head though.bysleightofhand wrote:I know its way way way early, but any progress on separating the gig and art print categories this year?