Iggy Pop Canvas 10 Fairey Release Discussion 07/01/10
-
TheThirdEye
- Art Expert
- Posts: 4486
- Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2009 12:07 am
- Location: Northern California
Wow..still up.
1. That's very mature of you. What are you, like 12?sasquatch wrote:You're a douche. 1. It's not a criminal case. 2. You're a douche.Brooks wrote:Perhaps he is too distracted by being under criminal investigation for tampering with evidence to put out good art...
http://www.pdnonline.com/pdn/content_di ... ee4561b155
2. How is lying in a lawsuit, deleting evidence and submitting fabricated evidence NOT a criminal case?
http://www.pdnonline.com/pdn/content_di ... 2625880379
(from the article)
"A court motion filed October 16 by Fairey's lawyers says Fairey made a mistake in the original lawsuit he filed on February 9, then tried to cover it up after he realized the mistake. The motion says: "Instead of acknowledging that mistake, Mr. Fairey attempted to delete the electronic files he had used in creating the illustration at issue. He also created, and delivered to his counsel for production, new documents to make it appear as though he had used the Clooney photograph as his reference."
A. you go to jail for crimesBrooks wrote:How is lying in a lawsuit, deleting evidence and submitting fabricated evidence NOT a criminal case?
B. you owe restitution in a LAWSUIT
1. You CAN go to jail for destroying evidence in a civil case
2. You CAN pay restitution in a Criminal Case.
2. You CAN pay restitution in a Criminal Case.
i guess i was being too general, damn lawyers 
If he is prosecuted (and I admit, that is a big if) for destroying evidence and lying in a lawsuit, then it could be a felony case (even obstructing justice), and any punishment could include jail time...schmoff wrote:A. you go to jail for crimesBrooks wrote:How is lying in a lawsuit, deleting evidence and submitting fabricated evidence NOT a criminal case?
B. you owe restitution in a LAWSUIT
This is all up in the air, I admit...who knows what will happen? **Shrug**
in addition (and more likely), they could give him a few days jail time if opposing counsel filed a Motion to Show Cause as to why Mr. Fairey shouldn't be held in contempt for destroying evidence.Brooks wrote:
If he is prosecuted (and I admit, that is a big if) for destroying evidence and lying in a lawsuit, then it could be a felony case (even obstructing justice), and any punishment could include jail time...
This is all up in the air, I admit...who knows what will happen? **Shrug**
