EB Forum

Superfro33 wrote:

captainhavoc wrote:I like the Stan Lee cameos. They're always fun. Y'all a buncha cynics.

And you're a dog pushing the button with his nose to get a treat.

Honestly RA nailed the problem, it's not so much the cameo as the completely blown up and over done audience reaction to it.

"I KNOW WHO THAT IS! I'M GOING TO MAKE SURE EVERYBODY KNOWS I KNOW TOO! BUT IT REALLY DOESN'T MATTER BECAUSE EVERYBODY KNOWS TOO. OH I KNOW, I'LL SAY "STAN LEE" REALLY LOUD SO THEN PEOPLE KNOW FOR SURE I KNOW! THIS IS HILARIOUS!"

captainhavoc wrote:

Superfro33 wrote:

captainhavoc wrote:I like the Stan Lee cameos. They're always fun. Y'all a buncha cynics.

And you're a dog pushing the button with his nose to get a treat.

Not taking anything too seriosuly, just find it annoying and disrespectful to bash something that hasn't even started production yet. I do know people that work their asses off on movies and TV shows. Are they the greatest movie or show to ever happen, no but they still take pride in what they do. It's just like bashing an artist for something they create and providing no reall critique besides "print sucks". I'm not even a huge Star Wars fan but I hold judgement until something visually is released.

Prime example, people bashing Heath Ledger when he was casted as Joker. people were shitting all over it and now look everyone praises him after they finally saw footage.

captainhavoc wrote:

Superfro33 wrote:

captainhavoc wrote:I like the Stan Lee cameos. They're always fun. Y'all a buncha cynics.

And you're a dog pushing the button with his nose to get a treat.

RottenAtom wrote:They're no Hitchcock cameos

Osan912 wrote:

RottenAtom wrote:They're no Hitchcock cameos

WRONG. ASM1 has Peter with a Rear Window Poster in his room. your criticisms are now moot.

Bikejoh wrote:

captainhavoc wrote:

Superfro33 wrote:

captainhavoc wrote:I like the Stan Lee cameos. They're always fun. Y'all a buncha cynics.

And you're a dog pushing the button with his nose to get a treat.

Osan912 wrote:

RottenAtom wrote:They're no Hitchcock cameos

WRONG. ASM1 has Peter with a Rear Window Poster in his room. your criticisms are now moot.

captainhavoc wrote:Scorsese cameos > Hitchcock cameos

omgkitty wrote:

Osan912 wrote:

RottenAtom wrote:They're no Hitchcock cameos

WRONG. ASM1 has Peter with a Rear Window Poster in his room. your criticisms are now moot.

He's also got a Blow Up poster, an XX record and a Fleet Foxes record. Kid's got good taste!

RottenAtom wrote:

captainhavoc wrote:Scorsese cameos > Hitchcock cameos

I love Scorsese cameos too, but that is incorrect. Can't beat the master.

matowest wrote:

omgkitty wrote:

Osan912 wrote:

RottenAtom wrote:They're no Hitchcock cameos

WRONG. ASM1 has Peter with a Rear Window Poster in his room. your criticisms are now moot.

He's also got a Blow Up poster, an XX record and a Fleet Foxes record. Kid's got good taste!

Because he's so hip, fresh, alternative and young. Don't you forget how hip Peter Parker is when you're watching this movie.

jlabbate wrote:

omgkitty wrote:

RottenAtom wrote:

jlabbate wrote:I do wish they would push back the film to Summer 21016..even though it's over 18months away..it doesn't seem like it will be enough timem to get all the post preduction/sfx done..i'd rather they take their time and get it right..as i really don't want another set of prequels

This. The movie's not going to be as good or as polished as it should be because they're putting the rush on it. Buncha greedy bitches

Once they start shooting and JJ realizes it wont be done in time, he'll have them push it back.

I sure hope so...I kept reading about the suits over at Fox, be very insistant that this be out by xmas 2015 to keep investors happy