lol, sounds like a scene from Family GuySuperfro33 wrote:And you're a dog pushing the button with his nose to get a treat.captainhavoc wrote:I like the Stan Lee cameos. They're always fun. Y'all a buncha cynics.
Honestly RA nailed the problem, it's not so much the cameo as the completely blown up and over done audience reaction to it.
"I KNOW WHO THAT IS! I'M GOING TO MAKE SURE EVERYBODY KNOWS I KNOW TOO! BUT IT REALLY DOESN'T MATTER BECAUSE EVERYBODY KNOWS TOO. OH I KNOW, I'LL SAY "STAN LEE" REALLY LOUD SO THEN PEOPLE KNOW FOR SURE I KNOW! THIS IS HILARIOUS!"
Mondotees/Alamo Poster News & Rumors thread
-
sidewaysscott
- Art God
- Posts: 23737
- Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 11:22 am
- Location: denver
Lee should just retire. Go spend his money.
pay via paypal, use credit card,file dispute at the 20 day mark if suspicious. don't deal with noobs. don't trade with noobs. request feedback ahead of time. there are lots of good people 'round here.
If you find what I posted to be disrespectful then there's a big problem there. There's a difference for me to personally tell the people working on the movie that it's going to suck and/or that it sucks than me posting it on the internet anonymously. Am I going to have to wait until the movie comes out to have an opinion on it?
Not taking anything too seriosuly, just find it annoying and disrespectful to bash something that hasn't even started production yet. I do know people that work their asses off on movies and TV shows. Are they the greatest movie or show to ever happen, no but they still take pride in what they do. It's just like bashing an artist for something they create and providing no reall critique besides "print sucks". I'm not even a huge Star Wars fan but I hold judgement until something visually is released.
Prime example, people bashing Heath Ledger when he was casted as Joker. people were shitting all over it and now look everyone praises him after they finally saw footage.
What you and it seems many americans have a problem with are opinions that you don't agree with and get pissed off at, that's how messed up the thought process of americans have been warped to. Get over it, it's just a damn movie.
and it's going to suck.
captainhavoc wrote:Superfro33 wrote:And you're a dog pushing the button with his nose to get a treat.captainhavoc wrote:I like the Stan Lee cameos. They're always fun. Y'all a buncha cynics.
danieldanger wrote: "...IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN STOUT. WHY WASNT IT STOUT? MY GOD PEOPLE, WE COULD BE HOLDING STOUT POSTERS RIGHT NOW."
He's also got a Blow Up poster, an XX record and a Fleet Foxes record. Kid's got good taste!Osan912 wrote:WRONG. ASM1 has Peter with a Rear Window Poster in his room. your criticisms are now moot.RottenAtom wrote:They're no Hitchcock cameos
This is my favorite exchange of todayBikejoh wrote:captainhavoc wrote:Superfro33 wrote:And you're a dog pushing the button with his nose to get a treat.captainhavoc wrote:I like the Stan Lee cameos. They're always fun. Y'all a buncha cynics.
-
RottenAtom
- Art Freak
- Posts: 14870
- Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 12:51 am
- Location: Houston, TX
You misread my post. (Or I wasn't clear enough) They're (as in they are) no Hitchcock cameos (as in they aren't as good as Hitchcock cameos, not 'there are no Hitchcock cameos')Osan912 wrote:WRONG. ASM1 has Peter with a Rear Window Poster in his room. your criticisms are now moot.RottenAtom wrote:They're no Hitchcock cameos
But yes- I did peep the the Rear Window poster! In 2 you see the bottom half of Antonioni's Blow Up poster and some Obey.
-
captainhavoc
- Art Expert
- Posts: 3406
- Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 11:44 pm
- Location: Austin
- Contact:
Scorsese cameos > Hitchcock cameos
Ayes wrote:Maybe all these dates who've been turning you down see you in your yard hurling cat food and blowing weed smoke at your neighbor's pets.
-
RottenAtom
- Art Freak
- Posts: 14870
- Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 12:51 am
- Location: Houston, TX
I love Scorsese cameos too, but that is incorrect. Can't beat the master.captainhavoc wrote:Scorsese cameos > Hitchcock cameos
Because he's so hip, fresh, alternative and young. Don't you forget how hip Peter Parker is when you're watching this movie.omgkitty wrote:He's also got a Blow Up poster, an XX record and a Fleet Foxes record. Kid's got good taste!Osan912 wrote:WRONG. ASM1 has Peter with a Rear Window Poster in his room. your criticisms are now moot.RottenAtom wrote:They're no Hitchcock cameos
-
captainhavoc
- Art Expert
- Posts: 3406
- Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 11:44 pm
- Location: Austin
- Contact:
RottenAtom wrote:I love Scorsese cameos too, but that is incorrect. Can't beat the master.captainhavoc wrote:Scorsese cameos > Hitchcock cameos
thoAyes wrote:Maybe all these dates who've been turning you down see you in your yard hurling cat food and blowing weed smoke at your neighbor's pets.
I mean, I'm into all those thingsmatowest wrote:Because he's so hip, fresh, alternative and young. Don't you forget how hip Peter Parker is when you're watching this movie.omgkitty wrote:He's also got a Blow Up poster, an XX record and a Fleet Foxes record. Kid's got good taste!Osan912 wrote:WRONG. ASM1 has Peter with a Rear Window Poster in his room. your criticisms are now moot.RottenAtom wrote:They're no Hitchcock cameos
pretty sure the FOX execs could care lessjlabbate wrote:I sure hope so...I kept reading about the suits over at Fox, be very insistant that this be out by xmas 2015 to keep investors happyomgkitty wrote:Once they start shooting and JJ realizes it wont be done in time, he'll have them push it back.RottenAtom wrote:This. The movie's not going to be as good or as polished as it should be because they're putting the rush on it. Buncha greedy bitchesjlabbate wrote:I do wish they would push back the film to Summer 21016..even though it's over 18months away..it doesn't seem like it will be enough timem to get all the post preduction/sfx done..i'd rather they take their time and get it right..as i really don't want another set of prequels
http://www.thewrap.com/next-star-wars-w ... x-fanfare/