OMG & G1988
-
fluffhead13
- Art Expert
- Posts: 5702
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 3:09 am
Was it mailed to you or did u pick it up?gonzo303 wrote:Got my Olly in today. Looks like scribbling, but its signed!
kinda lame.maden wrote:Some are signed, some aren't (based on the new site at least).
mistersmith wrote: Yet another pair of prints that I freak over, plan to frame for my office, buy for too much money, then stash away in a flat file because framing is balls expensive. Can't wait.
Any idea which arent signed besides Klausen's(if true)?
Thanks
Happy 'ol Monday!
Thanks
Happy 'ol Monday!
"...youre not actually looking at Schulz-Neudamm's tones and lines, youre looking at a jpg of those tones and lines run through a photoshop filter to make them simpler for a simpler printing method. so... superior? ..."
DD -2013
DD -2013
Klausen, Drew, Slater I believe.aky90be wrote:Any idea which arent signed besides Klausen's(if true)?
Thanks
Happy 'ol Monday!
Ahhhhhh, cant wait to see these in person!!!piomba wrote:got my tube today on the east coast. Duval and Bell are s/n and are lookin good.
Any shipment notification/tracking info beforehand or just showed up?
Thanks much
"...youre not actually looking at Schulz-Neudamm's tones and lines, youre looking at a jpg of those tones and lines run through a photoshop filter to make them simpler for a simpler printing method. so... superior? ..."
DD -2013
DD -2013
Just showed up, no notification. The Olly Moss is nice. The combination of paper used and orange reminds me of the way Kinsey was printing a few years ago. ie, Not a Gun.aky90be wrote:Ahhhhhh, cant wait to see these in person!!!piomba wrote:got my tube today on the east coast. Duval and Bell are s/n and are lookin good.
Any shipment notification/tracking info beforehand or just showed up?
Thanks much
Seriously. I'm not a baseball fan, but had it been a Hockey stadium I certainly wouldn't hang anything up in my house that had a big Budweiser logo on it.Catarax wrote:Patron wrote:That Danger piece is really well done, but the Budweiser logo kills anything it had going for it.
-
middayshadows
- Art Expert
- Posts: 5810
- Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 4:15 pm
- Location: Los Angeles
I think he obscured the logo somewhat, with that scaffolding in front of it, and not connecting the 'd' completely. But it is still obvious. With all the corporate logos in professional sports, they must be hard to ignore. Kind of have to show a lot of them or none at all. Not sure how else he could have handled it though. It is an iconic logo, and might be more distracting if he left it out.
Last edited by middayshadows on Tue Mar 16, 2010 3:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Would it better if it didn't say budweiser? perhaps ...Patron wrote:Seriously. I'm not a baseball fan, but had it been a Hockey stadium I certainly wouldn't hang anything up in my house that had a big Budweiser logo on it.Catarax wrote:Patron wrote:That Danger piece is really well done, but the Budweiser logo kills anything it had going for it.
But, it's Fenway ... and for those of us that grew up wathcing games in that park, this print is pretty much perfect.
We can easily see past the bud sign and get lost in the rest of the print for what it is.
Two links every EB member should read, please take a moment:mistersmith wrote:Brady is one of the best QBs in history and will forever been seen as such.
EB Wiki - How to Ship a Print in a Tube
Expressobeans For Sale Forum - Open Market Guidelines