The Art of Matt Taylor - A Discussion thread

iloveboobies · Mon Feb 22, 2016 4:28 am

Oof. Time for more unlicensed commissions!! Big money to be made.

agr719 · Wed Feb 24, 2016 9:02 am

Wed Feb 24, 2016 9:27 am

Which print?

sez752 · Wed Feb 24, 2016 9:33 am

mfaith wrote:Which print?

I believe bap is referring to the 2013 Private Commission LiT print. It sold for roughly $1,400.

Wed Feb 24, 2016 9:38 am

sez752 wrote:
mfaith wrote:Which print?
I believe bap is referring to the 2013 Private Commission LiT print. It sold for roughly $1,400.

Ah. I meant what iloveboobies was talking about but i guess they're the same. I forgot that original LiT was unlicensed.

mrsippycups · Wed Feb 24, 2016 9:48 am

mfaith wrote:
sez752 wrote:
mfaith wrote:Which print?
I believe bap is referring to the 2013 Private Commission LiT print. It sold for roughly $1,400.
Ah. I meant what iloveboobies was talking about but i guess they're the same. I forgot that original LiT was unlicensed.

Well it's not C&H so it really doesn't matter . . .

35mmpaul · Wed Feb 24, 2016 11:25 am

mfaith wrote:
sez752 wrote:
mfaith wrote:Which print?
I believe bap is referring to the 2013 Private Commission LiT print. It sold for roughly $1,400.
Ah. I meant what iloveboobies was talking about but i guess they're the same. I forgot that original LiT was unlicensed.

I very much doubt the second one was licensed either. Bill Murray isn't the easiest fish to catch when it comes to likeness rights.

Wed Feb 24, 2016 12:52 pm

35mmpaul wrote:
mfaith wrote:
sez752 wrote:
mfaith wrote:Which print?
I believe bap is referring to the 2013 Private Commission LiT print. It sold for roughly $1,400.
Ah. I meant what iloveboobies was talking about but i guess they're the same. I forgot that original LiT was unlicensed.
I very much doubt the second one was licensed either. Bill Murray isn't the easiest fish to catch when it comes to likeness rights.

Hm. Maybe this was already discussed, and I missed it. I thought Matt wasn't doing unlicensed commissions anymore, which i guess is what's driving some of my confusion.

35mmpaul · Wed Feb 24, 2016 12:56 pm

Yeah. He pulled out of a commission I was in due to this reason. So it was interesting to see this new LiT. But I don't know that 100%. So someone feel free to correct me.

Badbutch · Wed Feb 24, 2016 1:01 pm

Isn't the new LiT unlicensed too? If so, what's the difference?

finneganm · Wed Feb 24, 2016 1:06 pm

I thought it was licensed.

someasiandude · Wed Feb 24, 2016 1:07 pm

35mmpaul wrote:Yeah. He pulled out of a commission I was in due to this reason. So it was interesting to see this new LiT. But I don't know that 100%. So someone feel free to correct me.

I was in this same commission...still salty from it. I refuse to buy anything else that he does ever.

renpen2112 · Wed Feb 24, 2016 1:11 pm

someasiandude wrote:
35mmpaul wrote:Yeah. He pulled out of a commission I was in due to this reason. So it was interesting to see this new LiT. But I don't know that 100%. So someone feel free to correct me.
I was in this same commission...still salty from it. I refuse to buy anything else that he does ever.

What print was he supposed to be doing ??

finneganm · Wed Feb 24, 2016 1:13 pm

It was Vanilla Sky, and it was fantastic. I wonder what it would cost to get the license...

35mmpaul · Wed Feb 24, 2016 1:14 pm

finneganm wrote:I thought it was licensed.

I would be surprised that anything with Bill Murray likeness on it is licensed. The only thing I can really think of that is definitely official is the stuff from the G88 Ghostbusters show.

Like I stated above I don't know 100% so I don't want my word to be taken as law.