Page 4 of 7

Re: Invader in NYC (2013)

Posted: Thu Oct 31, 2013 10:25 pm
by rubberneck
Bottom row of tiles doesn't match?

Plus one white broken one is now blue.

Re: Invader in NYC (2013)

Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2013 10:59 am
by bone811
SO the owner of the building operates a art gallery inside and took the piece down? Guess he is not a street art fan. I also thought that the owner would have to press charges for anything to stick since it was public property?

Re: Invader in NYC (2013)

Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2013 11:06 am
by partpat
bone811 wrote:SO the owner of the building operates a art gallery inside and took the piece down? Guess he is not a street art fan. I also thought that the owner would have to press charges for anything to stick since it was public property?

Be a dick move to jask his piece (and ultimately sell it) and press charges - lot of a holes in the world though

Re: Invader in NYC (2013)

Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2013 11:18 am
by EG8
I am not so concerned about someone pressing charges for this instance. I am more concerned about the back log they have of EVERY invader piece in NY. I think they can hit him with all those charges. I bet they will too as they are salty ballz over not catching Banksy...
Graffitti task force can suck my ass.... :twisted:

Re: Invader in NYC (2013)

Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2013 11:21 am
by partpat
EG8 wrote:I am not so concerned about someone pressing charges for this instance. I am more concerned about the back log they have of EVERY invader piece in NY. I think they can hit him with all those charges. I bet they will too as they are salty ballz over not catching Banksy...
Graffitti task force can suck my ass.... :twisted:

Had this thought myself if they wanted to im sure they could drymount him good and proper right? Dont know much about graffiti law but have heard some crazy stories about people getting screwed by the MN task force for being in possesion of pictures etc linking them to their previous works... Dont know if they could really hold an international person here for graffiti crime though??

Re: Invader in NYC (2013)

Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2013 11:25 am
by bkboy77
this will be expensive for Invader.

Re: Invader in NYC (2013)

Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2013 12:06 pm
by EG8
I doubt he would get jail time, I think a lot of building owners will not press charges. Who knows though. Fines will be huge I would imagine.
I could also see a law stating that once you get busted for say 20 offenses it pushes you into a new more strict category. I don't have time to check on the law but I think thats how it would work.

Re: Invader in NYC (2013)

Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2013 1:15 pm
by DickButt
Out of jail and doing a giant collaboration piece in Bushwick :shock:
image.jpg
image.jpg

Re: Invader in NYC (2013)

Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2013 1:28 pm
by ToonKiller
Taking applications for look outs now maybe.

Re: Invader in NYC (2013)

Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2013 2:06 pm
by vile13
Think global ! Go local !
Nice collab !

Re: Invader in NYC (2013)

Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2013 11:19 am
by DickButt
Checked out the 2nd Kirby on Friday. I have locations on 6 other pieces plus the awesome collab with COST and ENX in Bushwick that I hope to check out this week. It also looks like he (or maybe just COST) is doing some Invader wheat pastes around town.
photo.JPG

Re: Invader in NYC (2013)

Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2013 11:51 am
by partpat
That Kirby is bad ass!! Thanks for sharing!!

Re: Invader in NYC (2013)

Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2013 11:54 am
by bkboy77
loving the new pieces.

Re: Invader in NYC (2013)

Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2013 11:55 am
by partpat
bkboy77 wrote:loving the new pieces.

A nice departure from the usual invasion pieces, love it

Re: Invader in NYC (2013)

Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2013 12:42 pm
by canuck
partpat wrote:Thanks for sharing!!