General art-related discussion.
-
DarkHallMansion
- Art Expert
- Posts: 1339
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 4:42 pm
Fri Jun 10, 2016 4:05 pm
matowest wrote:I don't even know what I'm looking at there...but it looks wrong
Notable Charles M. Schulz image that Marq chose to reference where Charlie Brown was rendered directly in double-take mode, and via both artists of course, the image has varied and broader interpretations, esp Charlie Brown in context of life. Think Binky might share that original Schulz image.
DHM
https://www.facebook.com/Dark-Hall-Mans ... 752134162/
-
matowest
- Art Expert
- Posts: 4896
- Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 1:09 am
-
RambosRemodeler
- Art Freak
- Posts: 18172
- Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2012 5:35 pm
Fri Jun 10, 2016 4:07 pm
Its ugly. Really ugly
choke wrote:I won't give up a flip that I can get myself to someone who is convinced they need it. None of us need any of this fudge. It's art. It's not medicine.
-
earlgreytoast
- Art Expert
- Posts: 9378
- Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 1:14 pm
Fri Jun 10, 2016 4:09 pm
matowest wrote:Is he supposed to be like...rapidly turning his head left to right...from indecision? Also, why shirtless?
yes, exactly. A pretty common Schulz technique to show movement of his characters.
Shirtless because someone just smoked a line-drive right past him. Another common Schulz theme on the baseball diamond.
Codeblue wrote:
I’m sorry for everything.
-
matowest
- Art Expert
- Posts: 4896
- Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 1:09 am
-
DarkHallMansion
- Art Expert
- Posts: 1339
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 4:42 pm
Fri Jun 10, 2016 4:11 pm
matowest wrote:Is he supposed to be like...rapidly turning his head left to right...from indecision? Also, why shirtless?
Yes, drawn like that in a stylized manner by Schulz to indicate the motion of game and speed of life, the shirtless ref in response to a line drive, both baseball and real life, ripping past Charlie Brown and his response to it. This kind of imagery recurs prominently in the strip, very famous. Same edition run sizes as with "Woodstock's Song of Love."
DHM
https://www.facebook.com/Dark-Hall-Mans ... 752134162/
-
RambosRemodeler
- Art Freak
- Posts: 18172
- Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2012 5:35 pm
Fri Jun 10, 2016 4:12 pm
Codeblue wrote:ZOMG SPOOOOOZ DOE!!!!
choke wrote:I won't give up a flip that I can get myself to someone who is convinced they need it. None of us need any of this fudge. It's art. It's not medicine.
-
35mmpaul
- Art Expert
- Posts: 8923
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 10:40 pm
- Location: NYC
Fri Jun 10, 2016 4:18 pm
RambosRemodeler wrote:Codeblue wrote:ZOMG SPOOOOOZ DOE!!!!
Will it flip if their is no foil edition?
jkw3000 - Nobody ever really wins in this hobby.
Olly - I'm a hack asshole unable to provide you with what you want.
Gonzo's Mom- And some of you are the demons!
-
jkw3000
- EB Team
- Posts: 28253
- Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2012 8:22 pm
- Location: NYC
Fri Jun 10, 2016 4:21 pm
I was a fan of the last one, and I get the specific reference being made. But the motion of Charlie spinning his head is hard to convey, and it's hard to see it here - it reads as a bit more static, which just makes his blockhead look odd. I do love the idea and the clothes placed everywhere though.
35mmpaul wrote:We are addicted to things that hurt our butts.
-
jkw3000
- EB Team
- Posts: 28253
- Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2012 8:22 pm
- Location: NYC
Fri Jun 10, 2016 5:54 pm
Yeah, I've seen the panel, but I also think a print depicting that one moment in time can sap the image of the psychology perception of motion that reading a comic strip from panel to panel can bring. But that's just my opinion, much respect still to Marq and to his point of reference with Schulz.
That "pow" panel is still one of my favorites though.
35mmpaul wrote:We are addicted to things that hurt our butts.
-
DarkHallMansion
- Art Expert
- Posts: 1339
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 4:42 pm
Fri Jun 10, 2016 6:05 pm
jkw3000 wrote:Yeah, I've seen the panel, but I also think a print depicting that one moment in time can sap the image of the psychology perception of motion that reading a comic strip from panel to panel can bring. But that's just my opinion, much respect still to Marq and to his point of reference with Schulz.
That "pow" panel is still one of my favorites though.
We think Marq reached to that Schulz imagery for a single stand alone print precisely because its surreal nature and strength speaks to something more broadly, with everyone being Charlie Brown on that mound at some point in life and our reaction to it, not solely the fun gags as you can imagine, since it's Schulz but also filtered via Marq's perception as artist as well so informs his choices.
Thanks on the input JK, DHM
https://www.facebook.com/Dark-Hall-Mans ... 752134162/
Last edited by
DarkHallMansion on Fri Jun 10, 2016 6:06 pm, edited 3 times in total.
-
kansasbbq
- Art God
- Posts: 21579
- Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 6:46 pm
- Location: AUSTIN, tx
Fri Jun 10, 2016 6:05 pm
RambosRemodeler wrote:Its ugly. Really ugly
And that's being kind.
Codeblue wrote:#whydidntilisten2kbbq