GiantBoyDective wrote:crustar just wanted a excuse to stroke himself off

Actually, the point of my post was that I have an updated shipping guide. The original shipping guide I posted is quite outdated.

GiantBoyDective wrote:crustar just wanted a excuse to stroke himself off
pewter14 wrote:You're not the only one on the hunt for The Thing ... just ... the most obvious ... by a lot.
Appreciate it. I wish I could edit my original post to make corrections. Ah well.mfaith wrote:Don't know about 'outdated'. It's a pretty badass guide. I used it myself for the first time last week, and it's definitely aces.
pewter14 wrote:You're not the only one on the hunt for The Thing ... just ... the most obvious ... by a lot.
GiantBoyDective wrote:crustar just wanted a excuse to stroke himself off
soleblazer wrote:GiantBoyDective wrote:soleblazer and I forgot we were posting in CrustaR's shipping thread
pewter14 wrote:You're not the only one on the hunt for The Thing ... just ... the most obvious ... by a lot.
danieldanger wrote:what you do aint hustlin. see, in MY hustle, i get to sell the whole run and each print only costs me like $6. y'alls is small potatoe street level fudge.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/ArtPrint/ryanfromindiana wrote:drymount all of you crying about missing, you probably aren't even true fans.
danieldanger wrote:what you do aint hustlin. see, in MY hustle, i get to sell the whole run and each print only costs me like $6. y'alls is small potatoe street level fudge.
It's not.bomb wrote:Got this from eBay member "celluart". Shipped in a flimsy scotch tube with no kraft paper. Print was in a plastic sleeve. The sky below the title is full of dents the whole way across. He claims I want a refund because the value of the print has gone down since I bought it. Sigh. (not sure this is the right thread).
Duh.biscocrack420 wrote:there's more than one correct way to pack a print for shipping
Wasn't gonna click on it, but saw it kept getting bumped. Decent Mondo drama.Sceazy wrote:Dude, this is the Art Care section, aint nobody gonna see dis fudge!!!
RupertPupkin wrote:I live by this rule and this rule alone: people are drymounting idiots.
My method is more for folks who are sending a non-replaceable print to others. Of course, I admit that my new guide needs quite a bit of work. Hopefully the concepts will prove useful to some while I hammer out the kinks.Codeblue wrote: P.S. The packing method in Crustar's sig is serious overkill. Stout would never waste that much time packing a print.
pewter14 wrote:You're not the only one on the hunt for The Thing ... just ... the most obvious ... by a lot.
How so? Don't they charge the same rate online as they would in person at the post office?woodrowgus wrote: Basket full o' tubes gets costly at the counter. Lots of $$ saved printing those labels at home.
maden wrote:I would like to see a 16"+ diameter tube.
BlakeAronson wrote:This one is just big enough, but not too overwhelming in size.
jordachep wrote:Can't believe the size. I want this so bad.