Pearl Jam Charlotte 96 EMEK
Forum rules
• Posts in this forum should directly relate to the artist, art, or artwork.
• Do not post ISOs or FS/Ts in this forum section. Please use the Open Market section of the EB forums for all secondary (resale) market activity.
• Do not post details of your order process, shipping status, or condition upon arrival in this forum section. Please use the item's Release Discussion thread for this activity.
• Posts in this forum should directly relate to the artist, art, or artwork.
• Do not post ISOs or FS/Ts in this forum section. Please use the Open Market section of the EB forums for all secondary (resale) market activity.
• Do not post details of your order process, shipping status, or condition upon arrival in this forum section. Please use the item's Release Discussion thread for this activity.
-
- Art Connoisseur
- Posts: 229
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 1:00 am
ChefFerrari wrote:The printer Highway Press made some extras unbeknownest to EMEK, those are where the majority of the unsigned ones come from
thats the story I got from Arminski,
stolen seems kinda exteme , what the unsigned ones really are , are printers proofs
-
- Art Connoisseur
- Posts: 108
- Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 2:00 am
- Location: North Hollywood, California
- Contact:
I don't know where this information comes from. I am the original publisher of the piece and I am not aware that the Highway Press made any quantities of extras although it is possible. The Highway Press also printed Arminski posters and I suppose that he saw extras of his own pieces being made.ChefFerrari wrote:The printer Highway Press made some extras unbeknownest to EMEK, those are where the majority of the unsigned ones come from
- attackonthebass
- Art Expert
- Posts: 1564
- Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 6:05 pm
- Contact:
Curious as to what kind of stock Emek was printing his art on in 96'collector59 wrote:I don't know where this information comes from. I am the original publisher of the piece and I am not aware that the Highway Press made any quantities of extras although it is possible. The Highway Press also printed Arminski posters and I suppose that he saw extras of his own pieces being made.ChefFerrari wrote:The printer Highway Press made some extras unbeknownest to EMEK, those are where the majority of the unsigned ones come from
Common sense, is not that common
- ackirkpatrick
- Art Expert
- Posts: 2160
- Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 7:55 pm
- Location: Northern Indiana
Shouldn't this info be noted on the poster's main page?attackonthebass wrote:Curious as to what kind of stock Emek was printing his art on in 96'collector59 wrote:I don't know where this information comes from. I am the original publisher of the piece and I am not aware that the Highway Press made any quantities of extras although it is possible. The Highway Press also printed Arminski posters and I suppose that he saw extras of his own pieces being made.ChefFerrari wrote:The printer Highway Press made some extras unbeknownest to EMEK, those are where the majority of the unsigned ones come from
-
- Art Connoisseur
- Posts: 229
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 1:00 am
mr_rugby wrote:FALSEpicturethis wrote: what the unsigned ones really are , are printers proofs
Emek still signs and numbers gradually...
He had to leave everything behind when he left La Imagerie', a pretty substantial pile of paper...
Debi has unsigned and signed posters, to label that stuff printers proofs is wrong.
He had to leave everything behind when he left La Imagerie', a pretty substantial pile of paper...
Debi has unsigned and signed posters, to label that stuff printers proofs is wrong.
-
- Art Connoisseur
- Posts: 229
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 1:00 am
wait, so what does that have to do with highway press?
That explains it, couldn't believe how many Emeks were on their site for sale.turnJBup wrote:Emek still signs and numbers gradually...
He had to leave everything behind when he left La Imagerie', a pretty substantial pile of paper...
Debi has unsigned and signed posters, to label that stuff printers proofs is wrong.