Pearl Jam Charlotte 96 EMEK

New topics are added by clicking the "Add Comment" link on an art entry. Off-topic posts may be purged.
Forum rules
• Posts in this forum should directly relate to the artist, art, or artwork.
• Do not post ISOs or FS/Ts in this forum section. Please use the Open Market section of the EB forums for all secondary (resale) market activity.
• Do not post details of your order process, shipping status, or condition upon arrival in this forum section. Please use the item's Release Discussion thread for this activity.
User avatar
jojobadass
Art Freak
Posts: 19946
Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 12:00 am
Location: chick-fila
Contact:

Mon Nov 20, 2006 9:18 am

Yamar wrote:Don't have one but yes, I believe that's true.
I actually bet that the person will be happy - if you dn't want to shell out for a large one, this can be a "better" option...

PJ charlotte 96 is quite possibly my favorite emek print.....so, maybe you're right, they'll probably be somewhat happy.
pjtaper
Art Freak
Posts: 10371
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2006 1:00 am
Location: Waiting on EMEKs site for another sale...

Mon Dec 25, 2006 2:31 pm

goddamn, a dry mounted one just went for $550...
User avatar
jojobadass
Art Freak
Posts: 19946
Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 12:00 am
Location: chick-fila
Contact:

Sun Apr 15, 2007 3:59 pm

so, no one finds it odd that the last two PJ posters sold for the same price. Nor, did anyone else find it strange that the buyer of the first was the seller of the second? :roll:
Flimby

Sun Apr 15, 2007 4:02 pm

jojobadass wrote:so, no one finds it odd that the last two PJ posters sold for the same price. Nor, did anyone else find it strange that the buyer of the first was the seller of the second? :roll:
yes and no
ryan_1969

Sun Apr 15, 2007 4:02 pm

jojobadass wrote:so, no one finds it odd that the last two PJ posters sold for the same price. Nor, did anyone else find it strange that the buyer of the first was the seller of the second? :roll:
yep, i posted that on bry. wtf?
User avatar
thegig
Art Expert
Posts: 3154
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 12:00 am
Location: rva
Contact:

Sun Apr 15, 2007 4:19 pm

jojobadass wrote:so, no one finds it odd that the last two PJ posters sold for the same price. Nor, did anyone else find it strange that the buyer of the first was the seller of the second? :roll:
:lol: I don't watch that closely...
User avatar
marshhouse
Art Expert
Posts: 1543
Joined: Tue Jan 20, 2004 1:00 am
Location: Almost Heaven

Sun Apr 15, 2007 4:31 pm

Flimby wrote:
jojobadass wrote:so, no one finds it odd that the last two PJ posters sold for the same price. Nor, did anyone else find it strange that the buyer of the first was the seller of the second? :roll:
yes and no
Win some. Lose some.
Bacon is love.
jacket
Member
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 1:00 am

Sun Apr 15, 2007 6:59 pm

The second one was only signed and not doodled which was the difference between the two. I still find it wierd that they both went for the same price. Ebay is getting rediculous when it comes to people "setting prices" or even you have to watch out for the second chance offers
User avatar
Codeblue
Yaks 2 Much
Posts: 52827
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 1:00 am
Location: Expresso Beans

Mon Apr 16, 2007 1:58 am

jojobadass wrote:so, no one finds it odd that the last two PJ posters sold for the same price. Nor, did anyone else find it strange that the buyer of the first was the seller of the second? :roll:
Yeah, I thought it was pretty ridon-ku-lous.
norbyjake
Art Connoisseur
Posts: 397
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:00 am

Mon Apr 16, 2007 9:01 am

This may be common knowledge, I don't know, but Emek printed the handbills when he left the LA gallery in early '03. He printed these so that (along with the Ministry, Tool, etc.) he could send them to perspective clients to show them some of his previous work. When I asked him about the handbills, his comment was, "they are neither old nor original".
User avatar
boatingbenny
Art Expert
Posts: 3389
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 12:00 am

Sat Apr 21, 2007 1:18 am

Anyone else think that the signature on the poster listed on EBAY right now looks fake? Notice the M on EMEK's signature...I have quite a few of signed EMEK's and I am sure there are people out there that have more than I do. Never have I seen one signed like this. EMEK does not connect the letters the only thing connecting is the K and this K looks off too. I say this is a fake. Below is a picture taken from the auction in question.
It is Item #200102313058 What do you guys think?
User avatar
boatingbenny
Art Expert
Posts: 3389
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 12:00 am

Sat Apr 21, 2007 1:24 am

Also too...notice on the year..the little ' indicating year is done the wrong way...EMEK always marks this ' the other way...left to right. This one goes right to left.
User avatar
lightyears2010
Art Expert
Posts: 8931
Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2003 12:00 am
Location: 1901 west madison street

Sat Apr 21, 2007 1:30 am

i think it's real. he signed that thing a looong time ago. sure, his sig doesnt look like that anymore, and i've never seen one like that but i still think it's legit. if i were interested in the poster i'd surely email that pic to him. he;ll tell ya if it's legit or not. i've done it before.
User avatar
boatingbenny
Art Expert
Posts: 3389
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 12:00 am

Sat Apr 21, 2007 1:34 am

Seriously..look at all of your EMEKS. I have looked at ones before and after. None are signed like that. Actually his signature has remained pretty consistent throughout the years.
palehighway

Sat Apr 21, 2007 1:35 am

edit
Last edited by palehighway on Fri Jun 27, 2008 7:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply