EB Forum

rubberneck wrote:Has it really been six years since this drop. Nuts!

I still have PTBH from carting it and losing the set

Baker wrote:My old set was numbered in the black, I remember it taking awhile to even find the numbering.

Same here. Haven't seen any white sigs?

wonkabars7 wrote:

mattkardish wrote:i got ripped for 4.5k and it was numbered in the black.

Story. and pics.

lot to go through...maybe i'll send a pm

Holy fudge, really?

ugh, wtf. deets?

mattkardish wrote:

wonkabars7 wrote:

mattkardish wrote:i got ripped for 4.5k and it was numbered in the black.

Story. and pics.

lot to go through...maybe i'll send a pm

No way! Sorry dude.

Story time!

A flawed but beautiful set to own.

These go on sale yet?

Keep F5'ing

wonkabars7 wrote:

earlgreytoast wrote:This set has been confirmed as some of the most bootlegged movie posters ever. If your set is on noticeably thin paper it is probably counterfeit.

By who?

Consider the source?

finneganm wrote:I would not say the paper is thin at all.

Hey Finn, pulled this from the Olly Moss Star Wars thread. I am looking to buy a set and trying to educate myself on what counterfeit copies might look/feel like vs the originals. Seems like quite a few images of the prints, including the twitter pic Olly shared a couple months ago, it is not uncommon for the prints to develop a wave in the paper outside of the heavy ink area. You said the prints are not on a thin paper, any other thoughts you can share on how one might spot a fake since you have the set?

Thanks!
John

I would think anyone who has seen a fuggin screenprint before would be able to pretty easily detect a fake in person.

Post pics plz thank you

$1500 for a set on eBay? https://www.ebay.com/itm/Star-Wars-MOND ... SwGzhaNU6Q. Unnumbered set, thousands below recent sales prices, longtime seller with little feedback (and no recent ratings). Seem fishy to you, or did someone get a bargain?