Page 3 of 3

Re: Great Went Walking Fish

Posted: Wed Feb 11, 2015 1:42 am
by flux3000
Mods - cleanup needed in the recent sales. Khanefeld seems to have listed his sale three times. And it has a strange number, "3rd artist".

Re: Great Went Walking Fish

Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2015 2:24 am
by Dalek
Just for the record, as I'm sure most people know by now, 22/100 walking fish is a fake.

Re: Great Went Walking Fish

Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2015 2:44 am
by sideshowbob
flux3000 wrote:Mods - cleanup needed in the recent sales. Khanefeld seems to have listed his sale three times. And it has a strange number, "3rd artist".
Fixed. That sale has already been added.

I submitted the original sale of this print for the seller, khanefeld. The edition information is correct.

Re: Great Went Walking Fish

Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2015 10:48 am
by haven
Dalek wrote:Just for the record, as I'm sure most people know by now, 22/100 walking fish is a fake.
Not necessarily. There is actually a #22 print, there is also a high res scan that circulated of the print. The one that popped up on ebay a while back was clearly a print out of the scan.

Re: Great Went Walking Fish

Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2015 2:58 pm
by phishstix101

Re: Great Went Walking Fish

Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2015 3:18 pm
by TranquilandSerene

so this listing was selling 3 of the fish- bold. Too weird to be fake right? like- who would do that?

Then he listed just 1 of them later that didnt sell.

The interesting part is that #77 was one of his- #75, 76, 77

But EB has #77 selling in '06

Re: Great Went Walking Fish

Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2015 3:22 pm
by finneganm
TranquilandSerene wrote:
But EB has #77 selling in '06
usually not a good sign...

Re: Great Went Walking Fish

Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2015 4:00 pm
by stuckeyc
2x post

Re: Great Went Walking Fish

Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2015 4:00 pm
by stuckeyc
Maybe he bought 77 in 06

Re: Phish Great Went Walking Fish Limestone 97 Pollock

Posted: Tue Sep 08, 2015 5:12 pm
by phishstix101
Not likely

Re: Great Went Walking Fish

Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2015 11:06 am
by TranquilandSerene
finneganm wrote:
TranquilandSerene wrote:
But EB has #77 selling in '06
usually not a good sign...
I contacted and asked them about it

They were adamant that the one from '06 isn't real. That they know other print makers, and Jim through them......
seemed pretty earnest.

They said they sold #77 privately to a person in Utah.

Really nice communication, they want to be transparent- just interesting. Sometimes truth is stranger than fiction?

Re: Phish Great Went Walking Fish Limestone 97 Pollock

Posted: Fri Sep 11, 2015 11:46 am
by applehead
There's always the possibility that the artist mistakenly numbered 2 different prints the same #.

Re: Great Went Walking Fish

Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2016 4:45 pm
by danielpmcauliffe
TranquilandSerene wrote:
finneganm wrote:
TranquilandSerene wrote:
But EB has #77 selling in '06
usually not a good sign...
I contacted and asked them about it

They were adamant that the one from '06 isn't real. That they know other print makers, and Jim through them......
seemed pretty earnest.

They said they sold #77 privately to a person in Utah.

Really nice communication, they want to be transparent- just interesting. Sometimes truth is stranger than fiction?
I bet I know who that person is. I could contact him and see if it's real.

2d AP

Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2018 9:29 pm
by automator
New image 2d AP


Image