That said, I think I shall add it to my collection while I'm here.

upseeker wrote:...living vicariously through another's altruism must be a crime worthy of the sixth level of hell in Dante's Inferno. Or maybe worse than ripping off someone else's art. What is that?... level 10?
norelation wrote:quit with the sniveling and just sell the damn poster. i don't care about your life story, we all got problems. just tell me about bent corners, or if your cat has used it for target practice.
mistersmith wrote:That means I'm going to touch you.
don't get the "you can't flip charity prints" argument. People that bought them to flip still donated money to charity. If they had not bought them to flip, less money would have gone to charity.MJBuck wrote:upseeker wrote:...living vicariously through another's altruism must be a crime worthy of the sixth level of hell in Dante's Inferno. Or maybe worse than ripping off someone else's art. What is that?... level 10?![]()
who gives a fudge?
just people being righteous.maden wrote:don't get the "you can't flip charity prints" argument. People that bought them to flip still donated money to charity. If they had not bought them to flip, less money would have gone to charity.MJBuck wrote:upseeker wrote:...living vicariously through another's altruism must be a crime worthy of the sixth level of hell in Dante's Inferno. Or maybe worse than ripping off someone else's art. What is that?... level 10?![]()
who gives a fudge?
norelation wrote:quit with the sniveling and just sell the damn poster. i don't care about your life story, we all got problems. just tell me about bent corners, or if your cat has used it for target practice.
mistersmith wrote:That means I'm going to touch you.
maden wrote: I don't get the "you can't flip charity prints" argument. People that bought them to flip still donated money to charity. If they had not bought them to flip, less money would have gone to charity.
In theory it's fine, if you dissect the original route of where the money ends up.MJBuck wrote:just people being righteous.maden wrote:don't get the "you can't flip charity prints" argument. People that bought them to flip still donated money to charity. If they had not bought them to flip, less money would have gone to charity.MJBuck wrote:upseeker wrote:...living vicariously through another's altruism must be a crime worthy of the sixth level of hell in Dante's Inferno. Or maybe worse than ripping off someone else's art. What is that?... level 10?![]()
who gives a fudge?
just people being righteous.[/quote]ColdSoreSuperstar wrote:don't get the "you can't flip charity prints" argument. People that bought them to flip still donated money to charity. If they had not bought them to flip, less money would have gone to charity.MJBuck wrote:upseeker wrote:...living vicariously through another's altruism must be a crime worthy of the sixth level of hell in Dante's Inferno. Or maybe worse than ripping off someone else's art. What is that?... level 10?![]()
who gives a fudge?
norelation wrote:quit with the sniveling and just sell the damn poster. i don't care about your life story, we all got problems. just tell me about bent corners, or if your cat has used it for target practice.
mistersmith wrote:That means I'm going to touch you.
There's a half-life on tragic events before comedians can use them in jokes. Sometimes a year or more.MJBuck wrote:when does it become acceptable then? or rational to sell it?ColdSoreSuperstar wrote:In theory it's fine, if you dissect the original route of where the money ends up.MJBuck wrote:just people being righteous.maden wrote: don't get the "you can't flip charity prints" argument. People that bought them to flip still donated money to charity. If they had not bought them to flip, less money would have gone to charity.
In practice, it bothers me. I don't really even know why, but it does. I'm exercising my right to be "irrational."