Nausicaa of the Valley of the Wind 21 Eng
Forum rules
• Posts in this forum should directly relate to the artist, art, or artwork.
• Do not post ISOs or FS/Ts in this forum section. Please use the Open Market section of the EB forums for all secondary (resale) market activity.
• Do not post details of your order process, shipping status, or condition upon arrival in this forum section. Please use the item's Release Discussion thread for this activity.
• Posts in this forum should directly relate to the artist, art, or artwork.
• Do not post ISOs or FS/Ts in this forum section. Please use the Open Market section of the EB forums for all secondary (resale) market activity.
• Do not post details of your order process, shipping status, or condition upon arrival in this forum section. Please use the item's Release Discussion thread for this activity.
-
- Art Connoisseur
- Posts: 598
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2014 5:49 pm
- Location: Brooklyn, NY
I would bet he makes way more money doing these as commissions rather than licensed.
Bottleneck released Spirited Away and Nausicaa from Karl Fitzgerald. Pretty sure those were licensed.
When I'm done ranting about elite power that rules the planet under a totalitarian government that uses the media to keep people stupid, my throat gets parched. That's why I drink Orange Drink. - BH
I'm assuming BNG and Spoke were all under the "inspired by" art print type blanket - don't think anybody's been able to get the license since Olly and the Stout vinyl. But I'm not the Joe you're looking for so ¯ \_(ツ)_/¯
35mmpaul wrote:We are addicted to things that hurt our butts.
- ygolohcysp
- Art Expert
- Posts: 2623
- Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 12:57 pm
When there's not really any enforcement why worry
If only laws and regulations didn’t exist. Those always come in the way of slam-dunk easy profit.
Was speaking more to just tastes being a factor. Mondo had that Ghibli piece by Ansin, that never went to print though cuz Miyazaki didn't like it. A slam-dunk in terms of popularity with prospective buyers getting nixed because it's not popular with the brass.
I have no horse in the race (neither an artist nor a licensor), just pointing out it's not crazy that some artists may not want that hassle.
35mmpaul wrote:We are addicted to things that hurt our butts.
- talkingdeads
- Art Expert
- Posts: 7269
- Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 6:54 pm
- Location: it's subjective
Just wondering: legally if a hammer were thrown (and most of the time it is just a cease and desist) who owns the "mea culpa" the artist or the commission group leader?
This kind of messages are normally sent to the party which is selling something.
Also, to add my 50 cents to above discussion, 99% of Ghibli prints sold during last years were not licensed, according to my knowledge.
Also, in a private comission artist normally payed way more money vs gallery, especially if its Mondo/BNG kind a gallery (please note that I love both!)
Also, to add my 50 cents to above discussion, 99% of Ghibli prints sold during last years were not licensed, according to my knowledge.
Also, in a private comission artist normally payed way more money vs gallery, especially if its Mondo/BNG kind a gallery (please note that I love both!)
some pretty active/relevant artists have been blacklisted by license holders due to private commissionstalkingdeads wrote: ↑Fri Apr 30, 2021 4:17 pmJust wondering: legally if a hammer were thrown (and most of the time it is just a cease and desist) who owns the "mea culpa" the artist or the commission group leader?
kinda like aj being banned from official phish merch.
Story time!cotis wrote: ↑Mon May 03, 2021 9:55 amsome pretty active/relevant artists have been blacklisted by license holders due to private commissionstalkingdeads wrote: ↑Fri Apr 30, 2021 4:17 pmJust wondering: legally if a hammer were thrown (and most of the time it is just a cease and desist) who owns the "mea culpa" the artist or the commission group leader?
RupertPupkin wrote:I live by this rule and this rule alone: people are drymounting idiots.