South Park: The Avengers 16 The Dark Inker

[jeffreyjonesbsme]

I bet the one on EBay goes for 8-900 bucks.

Doubt it. Mostly because it has a $175 buy it now. Same seller also has a stack of the other South Park commish for $40, literally a stack. Must have!

Ha Ha
I took that picture.
The only "stack" is a very small one in my flat file.

[finneganm]

Sorry, meant 8-9 bucks.

[Creation88]

why?

i haven't seen south park in a while did they do an Avenger spoof? is this just to spoof the poster?

[Nothing]

It's funny because it rips off someone's art while using ambiguous characters from South Park that reference nothing from the show while having no connection whatsoever to the subject.

This is a funny print indeed.

[lilorphanFunkhouser]

[GiantBoyDective]

[shredkeenan]

I don't have a philosophical problem with this poster. That said, it's just not a very well done parody. In my opinion, the main reason the characters don't look right is the eyes. The rotation of the ovals that make the eyeballs, and the pupil sizes are off for most of the characters. Also, the eyes should not be outlined in black. The artist even did the eye outline on his last South Park print, which I don't understand at all since the faces are printed in flesh-tone so there's no need to use a black line to define the eye. They would have had to get a bit more creative here since most of the faces are white, but it could be done. The eye shape and pupil size are such trivial, easy things to get right - unless it was done wrong intentionally for some reason, I have a hard time taking the artist seriously.

[wottagunn]

I've seen every ep of South Park, some multiple times, and I can't pick most of the characters on this poster. Are there four Cartmans?
not trying to slag it off, just honestly confused.

[jkw3000]

The joke is definitely stretched thin. But whatevs, so long as the people who bought in are happy.

[FAMPart]

Always a big fan of South park, but I think this would've made more sense if it was a parody of stouts avengers using the coon and friends characters. I dunno just my thoughts.

this.... would have made it 10000 times better, well that, and better renderings.

+1 on this^ sub.

some dreams may happen...or at least a variation of it.

[selassielion]

I don't have a philosophical problem with this poster. That said, it's just not a very well done parody. In my opinion, the main reason the characters don't look right is the eyes. The rotation of the ovals that make the eyeballs, and the pupil sizes are off for most of the characters. Also, the eyes should not be outlined in black. The artist even did the eye outline on his last South Park print, which I don't understand at all since the faces are printed in flesh-tone so there's no need to use a black line to define the eye. They would have had to get a bit more creative here since most of the faces are white, but it could be done. The eye shape and pupil size are such trivial, easy things to get right - unless it was done wrong intentionally for some reason, I have a hard time taking the artist seriously.

This. All this. Really poor renderings of a pretty simple cartoon.

[legallyvile]

The Title Treatment should have been "The Offenders"

[cotis]

The Title Treatment should have been "The Offenders"

[legallyvile]

The Title Treatment should have been "The Offenders"

And this isn't because I was offended by the poster or art but rather because South Park is known to be offensive...at least that's what the word on the street it.

It just seems to me to have a parody it needs to be a full on parody including title.

To keep the same title, would be like Mel Brooks calling Space Balls: Star Wars.

[PepsiPerfect]

What was the run size for this?