New topics are added by clicking the "Add Comment" link on an art entry. Off-topic posts may be purged.
Forum rules
• Posts in this forum should directly relate to the artist, art, or artwork.
• Do not post ISOs or FS/Ts in this forum section. Please use the Open Market section of the EB forums for all secondary (resale) market activity.
• Do not post details of your order process, shipping status, or condition upon arrival in this forum section. Please use the item's Release Discussion thread for this activity.
-
3son
- Art Connoisseur
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2013 9:30 am
- Location: Älvsyssel
Fri Oct 23, 2015 12:23 pm
Man! She's really been on a roll lately

. Very excited for what to come...

.
-
khetti
- Art Enthusiast
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 8:55 pm
Fri Oct 23, 2015 12:31 pm
jmagee87 wrote:I'm not saying it detracts from the print. I still think it's amazing. Just think it's odd when an artist is spot on with some likenesses and off on others in the same print
Maybe they didn't have likeness rights for the people that look off.

-
allyouzombies
- Art Connoisseur
- Posts: 564
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2014 5:49 pm
- Location: Atlanta, GA
-
jrsheppa
- Art Expert
- Posts: 5425
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 12:23 pm
- Location: The South
Fri Oct 23, 2015 7:57 pm
PrintNoob87 wrote:Yeah, it'd be kinda like saying Rich Kelly's likenesses were off. Think this more about the artist's personal style vs. just drawing poor likenesses.
All Rich Kelly's likenesses are stylized. They are all intentionally off or exaggerated to fit the style of the piece. With this, it doesn't seem intentional because some are spot on and some aren't. I'm not trying to say she was going for photorealism, but I don't think the likenesses being off was intentional either.
-
Bikejoh
- Art Expert
- Posts: 4264
- Joined: Mon Sep 09, 2013 11:40 pm
Fri Oct 23, 2015 8:07 pm
jrsheppa wrote:PrintNoob87 wrote:Yeah, it'd be kinda like saying Rich Kelly's likenesses were off. Think this more about the artist's personal style vs. just drawing poor likenesses.
All Rich Kelly's likenesses are stylized. They are all intentionally off or exaggerated to fit the style of the piece. With this, it doesn't seem intentional because some are spot on and some aren't. I'm not trying to say she was going for photorealism, but I don't think the likenesses being off was intentional either.
It certainly was not intentional. Her specialty is female likenesses, especially Asian ones. Keep in mind this is her third screenprint EVER, she hasn't really done any serious work involving heavy male likenesses before this. It was bold of her to design a composition with so many, but I don't think it's bad at all.
Honestly, after the rest of the variant artwork was finished and color was added, I forgot all about the likenesses.
-
Bikejoh
- Art Expert
- Posts: 4264
- Joined: Mon Sep 09, 2013 11:40 pm
-
brettlv5506
- Art Connoisseur
- Posts: 909
- Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2011 4:52 pm
- Location: Texas
Sat Oct 24, 2015 2:59 am
Fox Searchlight shared it on their instagram as well.
EDIT Beat me too it
Last edited by
brettlv5506 on Sat Oct 24, 2015 3:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
skis007
- Art Expert
- Posts: 3309
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2012 4:37 pm
- Location: Nuestra Señora la Reina de los Ángeles
-
Contact:
Sat Oct 24, 2015 3:00 am
Is that a young Salvador Dali in the top left?
-
RambosRemodeler
- Art Freak
- Posts: 18164
- Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2012 5:35 pm
Sat Oct 24, 2015 3:00 am
I'm not crazy about the print but the artist is extremely talented. Looking forward to seeing more from her. Congrats to everyone involved


choke wrote:I won't give up a flip that I can get myself to someone who is convinced they need it. None of us need any of this fudge. It's art. It's not medicine.