Goonies 15 Stout

New topics are added by clicking the "Add Comment" link on an art entry. Off-topic posts may be purged.
Forum rules
• Posts in this forum should directly relate to the artist, art, or artwork.
• Do not post ISOs or FS/Ts in this forum section. Please use the Open Market section of the EB forums for all secondary (resale) market activity.
• Do not post details of your order process, shipping status, or condition upon arrival in this forum section. Please use the item's Release Discussion thread for this activity.
blazin173
Art Connoisseur
Posts: 107
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2010 2:00 am

Sun Dec 06, 2015 7:05 pm

Love the Regular one the best to.
User avatar
punch
Art Expert
Posts: 3983
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2013 12:22 pm

Sun Dec 06, 2015 7:22 pm

The Reg looks way better than I thought it would.
automator
Nobody
Posts: 140522
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 2:00 am

Mon Dec 07, 2015 9:46 am

New image Goonies 15 Stout - Detail


Image
automator
Nobody
Posts: 140522
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 2:00 am

Mon Dec 07, 2015 9:46 am

New image Goonies 15 Stout - Detail


Image
automator
Nobody
Posts: 140522
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 2:00 am

Mon Dec 07, 2015 9:46 am

New image Goonies 15 Stout - Detail


Image
automator
Nobody
Posts: 140522
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 2:00 am

Mon Dec 07, 2015 9:46 am

New image Goonies 15 Stout - Detail


Image
automator
Nobody
Posts: 140522
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 2:00 am

Mon Dec 07, 2015 9:46 am

New image Goonies 15 Stout - Detail


Image
User avatar
jcbudny
Art Connoisseur
Posts: 656
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2011 1:45 pm

Tue Dec 08, 2015 9:17 am

I have the MC variant and my regular showed up yesterday. I have to admit, the regular is much better looking than I thought it would be. The inks look great in person. Not sure I can call a winner between the two anymore. The regular is one of those rare occurrences where the print looks > the JPEG.
THC x 3
User avatar
jcbudny
Art Connoisseur
Posts: 656
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2011 1:45 pm

Tue Dec 08, 2015 9:20 am

matowest wrote:Reg has the notes on the back. I'm a happy camper :D
How often are you going to see the back of your print once it's framed though?
THC x 3
User avatar
dylanosaur
Art Expert
Posts: 1539
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 10:53 am

Tue Dec 08, 2015 9:25 am

prints always look better than the jpegs. The only example I can think of otherwise is JC's Prometheus print.
User avatar
Kramerica
Art Freak
Posts: 14490
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2012 11:37 am
Location: Corner of 1st & 1st

Tue Dec 08, 2015 10:40 am

dylanosaur wrote:prints always look better than the jpegs. The only example I can think of otherwise is JC's Prometheus print.
Exactly my thought. I feel like it is rare when a print looks worse than the jpeg.
When I'm done ranting about elite power that rules the planet under a totalitarian government that uses the media to keep people stupid, my throat gets parched. That's why I drink Orange Drink. - BH
User avatar
mnelson
Art Connoisseur
Posts: 548
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 2:17 am
Location: NC

Tue Dec 08, 2015 11:40 am

I was thinking the same thing when I read that. Prints look better in person than their jpegs like 95% of the time, in my personal experience.
User avatar
dasponyboy
Art Expert
Posts: 5363
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 3:47 pm
Location: THE ILL

Tue Dec 08, 2015 10:56 pm

Kramerica wrote:
dylanosaur wrote:prints always look better than the jpegs. The only example I can think of otherwise is JC's Prometheus print.
Exactly my thought. I feel like it is rare when a print looks worse than the jpeg.
All JC jpeg's look better tho
User avatar
matowest
Art Expert
Posts: 4896
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 1:09 am

Tue Dec 08, 2015 11:14 pm

dasponyboy wrote:
Kramerica wrote:
dylanosaur wrote:prints always look better than the jpegs. The only example I can think of otherwise is JC's Prometheus print.
Exactly my thought. I feel like it is rare when a print looks worse than the jpeg.
All JC jpeg's look better tho
Except Jurassic Park :D
User avatar
dasponyboy
Art Expert
Posts: 5363
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 3:47 pm
Location: THE ILL

Tue Dec 08, 2015 11:49 pm

matowest wrote:
dasponyboy wrote:
Kramerica wrote:
dylanosaur wrote:prints always look better than the jpegs. The only example I can think of otherwise is JC's Prometheus print.
Exactly my thought. I feel like it is rare when a print looks worse than the jpeg.
All JC jpeg's look better tho
Except Jurassic Park :D
True, totally forgot!
Post Reply