Grateful Dead Chicago 15 Biffle
Forum rules
• Posts in this forum should directly relate to the artist, art, or artwork.
• Do not post ISOs or FS/Ts in this forum section. Please use the Open Market section of the EB forums for all secondary (resale) market activity.
• Do not post details of your order process, shipping status, or condition upon arrival in this forum section. Please use the item's Release Discussion thread for this activity.
• Posts in this forum should directly relate to the artist, art, or artwork.
• Do not post ISOs or FS/Ts in this forum section. Please use the Open Market section of the EB forums for all secondary (resale) market activity.
• Do not post details of your order process, shipping status, or condition upon arrival in this forum section. Please use the item's Release Discussion thread for this activity.
-
biscocrack420
- Art Expert
- Posts: 5913
- Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2009 2:29 pm
i think i'm going to nominate this . print looks great!! i think i may have to get this framed up proper.
-
DireWolfCichlids
- Art Enthusiast
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2015 10:56 pm
how much were these originally, $70?
-
biscocrack420
- Art Expert
- Posts: 5913
- Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2009 2:29 pm
lithos were 30 screenprints were 70
Correct for Santa Clara... For Chicago, lithos were $30 and screenprints were $60.biscocrack420 wrote:lithos were 30 screenprints were 70
I always defer to someone who's wearing a beater, regardless of what else he's wearing.
-
DireWolfCichlids
- Art Enthusiast
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2015 10:56 pm
Very odd situation for me here. I have a print from the original run of 2015. My print has no numbering whatsoever. Here is my print first and then 2 others with numbers. I have 9 pics of others with numbering but 2 serves the purpose here.
Any thoughts on one with no numbering? Is it in theory worth more as it would be a 1 of a kind, lol.
The only way I can think of how this occurred is 2 prints were stuck together when numbering and this one got missed. Assuming mine is the only one, I wonder what the person thought when he ran out and only got to 2014, lol?
Any thoughts on one with no numbering? Is it in theory worth more as it would be a 1 of a kind, lol.
The only way I can think of how this occurred is 2 prints were stuck together when numbering and this one got missed. Assuming mine is the only one, I wonder what the person thought when he ran out and only got to 2014, lol?
