Lawrence of Arabia 13 Moss
Forum rules
• Posts in this forum should directly relate to the artist, art, or artwork.
• Do not post ISOs or FS/Ts in this forum section. Please use the Open Market section of the EB forums for all secondary (resale) market activity.
• Do not post details of your order process, shipping status, or condition upon arrival in this forum section. Please use the item's Release Discussion thread for this activity.
• Posts in this forum should directly relate to the artist, art, or artwork.
• Do not post ISOs or FS/Ts in this forum section. Please use the Open Market section of the EB forums for all secondary (resale) market activity.
• Do not post details of your order process, shipping status, or condition upon arrival in this forum section. Please use the item's Release Discussion thread for this activity.
- tenaciousjack
- Art Expert
- Posts: 2884
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 4:06 pm
Mine showed up in NJ last Saturday.
Unfortunately the rolling job was not great, as the print was actually very close to the edge of the kraft paper.
Unfortunately the rolling job was not great, as the print was actually very close to the edge of the kraft paper.
- theperfecttree
- EB Team
- Posts: 11789
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 1:04 am
- Location: Austin, TX
was it ok though?tenaciousjack wrote:Mine showed up in NJ last Saturday.
Unfortunately the rolling job was not great, as the print was actually very close to the edge of the kraft paper.
- tenaciousjack
- Art Expert
- Posts: 2884
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 4:06 pm
Not really, a crease along the bottom edge in addition to what olly posted when it was for sale.
- mmhmichael
- Member
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2013 4:35 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
- Contact:
Does anybody know the backstory of who commissioned this print and why it didn't get a bigger release? Seems like with a such a big license it would've been tied to a special screening of some sort.
I think the sketch/concept was originally for a poster tie in with the blu-ray release, but was unused by the studio. They must be daft as it's great...one of my favourite posters Olly has created.mmhmichael wrote:Does anybody know the backstory of who commissioned this print and why it didn't get a bigger release? Seems like with a such a big license it would've been tied to a special screening of some sort.
- Swim2surfbig
- New User
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Mon Mar 24, 2014 7:17 pm
I just purchased this poster from a reseller and tried to frame it, only to discover it's dimensions are not exactly 24x36. It's more like 23x33. Is this the correct size?
The answer you seek was on the first page of this very thread.Swim2surfbig wrote:I just purchased this poster from a reseller and tried to frame it, only to discover it's dimensions are not exactly 24x36. It's more like 23x33. Is this the correct size?
bert wrote:I think it's A1 which is 23.4" x 33.1"Sluggotimmy wrote:What's the size of this?
- bikewrecked
- Art Connoisseur
- Posts: 163
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 12:12 pm
Literally? Didnt think that sounded believable?jahitch1 wrote:This is literally one of my favorite pieces I have on my wall.
Great reply. We've all been waiting 8 months for someone to nail that guy on his use of "literally". Thanks.bikewrecked wrote:Literally? Didnt think that sounded believable?jahitch1 wrote:This is literally one of my favorite pieces I have on my wall.
bhutanpro wrote:Great reply. We've all been waiting 8 months for someone to nail that guy on his use of "literally". Thanks.bikewrecked wrote:Literally? Didnt think that sounded believable?jahitch1 wrote:This is literally one of my favorite pieces I have on my wall.
Was that 'waiting 8 months' ...or 'literally waiting 8 months?'
- readicculus86
- Art Expert
- Posts: 1090
- Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 6:09 pm
Anyone know if the blue or green editions actually exist? None in anyones collection...