rubberneck wrote:
I saw no coconut. He had no coconut to my knowledge.
rubberneck wrote:
...which isn't frowned upon by The Ten...its just more gravy on the back end.rubberneck wrote:But there was no showcasing, it was simply added to DB. All the hub-bub is everyone else...wonkabars7 wrote:No. Because it has a different purpose.finneganm wrote:Should you stop adding originals then?
I have no issue with adding it to the DB, either.
And technically I don't care about LIT or The Chosen Ten, just reacting to how it seems silly that it is such a closed/elitist effort, yet the showcasing and hubbub is so ZOMG.
No offense taken. And framed/latest acquisitions is apples and oranges.iambillyg wrote:Adding a piece of art, whether it's an edition of 1 or 10,000, to a database and forum dedicated to discussing art shouldn't be looked at as flaunting or gloating. It should be looked at as a contribution, because it is.
I don't get how people take offense to this, yet posting photos of your framed pieces or latest acquisitions (OG or otherwise) garners praise and congrats.
Agreed.appletree wrote:People are so envious of what they cannot have.
All these posters will be dust covered and forgotten one day.
People should just be thankful for what they have and move on. Everyone on this site is 100x better off than people all over the world.
#pointless rant #firstworldproblems
No offense taken either. And none intended. It's a healthy discussion.wonkabars7 wrote:No offense taken. And framed/latest acquisitions is apples and oranges.iambillyg wrote:Adding a piece of art, whether it's an edition of 1 or 10,000, to a database and forum dedicated to discussing art shouldn't be looked at as flaunting or gloating. It should be looked at as a contribution, because it is.
I don't get how people take offense to this, yet posting photos of your framed pieces or latest acquisitions (OG or otherwise) garners praise and congrats.
http://expressobeans.com/public/detail.php/165902wonkabars7 wrote:I have no idea how many were used/hung, but probably not many...I wouldn't be shocked if it was under 10-20 to be honest, at most."
I understand it. There's just quite a bit of grey area surrounding the recent commissions that have been posted.wonkabars7 wrote:My initial point is closed v. open.
In the case of Pan's it wasn't created exclusively. It was made for general public. The studio canceling it makes it rare, yes, but the sales of the remaining stock was open to everyone...the theater manager didn't give them to his closest friends then post on a dorky internet forum with a bunch of sharks and vultures. Does that make sense? Maybe not...
I hear ya and get all this.iambillyg wrote:I understand it. There's just quite a bit of grey area surrounding the recent commissions that have been posted.wonkabars7 wrote:My initial point is closed v. open.
In the case of Pan's it wasn't created exclusively. It was made for general public. The studio canceling it makes it rare, yes, but the sales of the remaining stock was open to everyone...the theater manager didn't give them to his closest friends then post on a dorky internet forum with a bunch of sharks and vultures. Does that make sense? Maybe not...
Our commissions appear to be perceived as bad because: they're limited to 10 (15 in this case), because they were made for a private group and not a group with an open invitation, because our copies were not (and never will be) released on an open store front like BigCartel (even though others pursuing commissions aren't offering theirs like this either). It just seemed as though the initial argument was more about how people shouldn't post content that no one else has a chance to obtain.
So basically you are just upset at not being asked in the first place?wonkabars7 wrote:I hear ya and get all this.iambillyg wrote:I understand it. There's just quite a bit of grey area surrounding the recent commissions that have been posted.wonkabars7 wrote:My initial point is closed v. open.
In the case of Pan's it wasn't created exclusively. It was made for general public. The studio canceling it makes it rare, yes, but the sales of the remaining stock was open to everyone...the theater manager didn't give them to his closest friends then post on a dorky internet forum with a bunch of sharks and vultures. Does that make sense? Maybe not...
Our commissions appear to be perceived as bad because: they're limited to 10 (15 in this case), because they were made for a private group and not a group with an open invitation, because our copies were not (and never will be) released on an open store front like BigCartel (even though others pursuing commissions aren't offering theirs like this either). It just seemed as though the initial argument was more about how people shouldn't post content that no one else has a chance to obtain.
I do think that there should be efforts or discussions about EB wide prints or commissions as I mention here earlier. And if perimeters are needed, like a certain level of EB points, join date, etc...that can be addressed. Maybe my politics are coming into play on a silly hobby forum, lul, but I think things should be accessible within the EB family. Except the red headed stepchildren of this place...you know who you are.