LD decided on a smart alternative, I guess.
Jaws 13 Durieux
Forum rules
• Posts in this forum should directly relate to the artist, art, or artwork.
• Do not post ISOs or FS/Ts in this forum section. Please use the Open Market section of the EB forums for all secondary (resale) market activity.
• Do not post details of your order process, shipping status, or condition upon arrival in this forum section. Please use the item's Release Discussion thread for this activity.
• Posts in this forum should directly relate to the artist, art, or artwork.
• Do not post ISOs or FS/Ts in this forum section. Please use the Open Market section of the EB forums for all secondary (resale) market activity.
• Do not post details of your order process, shipping status, or condition upon arrival in this forum section. Please use the item's Release Discussion thread for this activity.
- rubberneck
- Art God
- Posts: 26101
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 11:19 pm
- Location: Houston, TX
I can't be more disappointed with this new explotation of the Jaws poster success.
- rubberneck
- Art God
- Posts: 26101
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 11:19 pm
- Location: Houston, TX
It has been 7 years and it's not a reprint. So there's that. And he's been doing pseudo tourism posters for years too.wakam wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 6:50 am
I can't be more disappointed with this new explotation of the Jaws poster success.
No problem with the companion print concept, I would have bought if I liked it. The problem I see is that a tourism poster with a "no swimming - hazardous area - beach closed" sign makes no sense. There was no need of adding Jaws references that are not only unnecessary but even worse, obstruct the idea of the tourism advert. Also the hidden fin seems a little bit overforced.rubberneck wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 9:54 amIt has been 7 years and it's not a reprint. So there's that. And he's been doing pseudo tourism posters for years too.wakam wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 6:50 am
I can't be more disappointed with this new explotation of the Jaws poster success.
Bingo!wakam wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 1:04 pmNo problem with the companion print concept, I would have bought if I liked it. The problem I see is that a tourism poster with a "no swimming - hazardous area - beach closed" sign makes no sense. There was no need of adding Jaws references that are not only unnecessary but even worse, obstruct the idea of the tourism advert. Also the hidden fin seems a little bit overforced.
Codeblue wrote:#whydidntilisten2kbbq
- wonkabars7
- Art Expert
- Posts: 7287
- Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 2:13 pm
- wonkabars7
- Art Expert
- Posts: 7287
- Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 2:13 pm
There will always be outliers that will withstand any bubble.
This one, Moss SW, Slater Goldfinger, etc etc that non-traditional print collectors/buyers will always fork out tons of cash for.
This one, Moss SW, Slater Goldfinger, etc etc that non-traditional print collectors/buyers will always fork out tons of cash for.