EB Forum

Interesting case for partisanship beating policy and economic self-interest. Idea is there is no determinative swing vote, turnout is everything, and motivation is negative, not positive. Seems like it's worked for the GOP post-W, and maybe even in 04. https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/02/...

These are nice.

Prescient

https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/b ... p-waiting/

finneganm wrote: ↑

Wed Feb 19, 2020 3:11 pm

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... nd=premium

Lulzzzzzzzzz

Friedman on raw power. Won't miss his terrible metaphors when he's done, even if he's right in this case (edit: about the current election). He gets to the raw power around 1:50.

Romney. Who knew.

Trump's and his friends' grand plans are going just fine.

https://twitter.com/sbg1/status/1223334750179528704

That post right there will do fine. You will know them by the fruit they sell etc

Right on cue, back to stumpin for Trump.

finneganm wrote: ↑

Thu Oct 31, 2019 6:11 am

You’re Australian?

.roo

https://twitter.com/behindyourback/stat ... 8020902913

An imperial fucktonne.

That code word server... https://nofilmschool.com/sites/default/files/styles/article_wide/public/www.cinematheia.com-pulp-fiction.jpg?itok=1BFO5SZR https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/27/world/europe/trump-putin-russia-calls.html https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/27/politics/white-house-restricted-trump-calls...