Member Usage Policy: pedophilia accusations
- jojobadass
- Art God
- Posts: 20463
- Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 12:00 am
- Location: chick-fila-of-da-sea
- Contact:
is this about the michael jackson tv special?
For the best concert and movie posters available, check out: http://www.jojosposters.com
For other art crap....be sure to check out: http://www.jojosfineart.com
And for the kinkiest records in the world......check out the newest website in the Jojo Empire: http://www.jojosrecords.com
For other art crap....be sure to check out: http://www.jojosfineart.com
And for the kinkiest records in the world......check out the newest website in the Jojo Empire: http://www.jojosrecords.com
- talkingdeads
- Art Expert
- Posts: 7275
- Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2008 6:54 pm
- Location: it's subjective
Oh dang Shawn is still here? There may be hope yet
- ToolFanFromWayBack
- Art Expert
- Posts: 5810
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 2:05 am
- Location: Houston, TX
I think the trump thread has enough attention already...ygolohcysp wrote:PLUSH wrote:Links, pics, or it didn't happen.ygolohcysp wrote:I'm not going to put a link here, no reason to draw more attention to it. I already reported the post when I saw it but the volunteers are swamped with other things.
I need more. Nothing seems to satisfy. I don't want it. I just need it. To feel, to breathe, to know I'm alive. - MJK
“People incapable of guilt usually have a good time.” - Rust Cohle
Presenting Codeblue's 30000th post -
“People incapable of guilt usually have a good time.” - Rust Cohle
Presenting Codeblue's 30000th post -
Codeblue wrote:bump
- aahnutz
- EB Team
- Posts: 21776
- Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 12:00 am
- Location: Some place I'd rather not be...
You might as well post it. Nothing like bringing more attention to it by starting a thread about it.ygolohcysp wrote:Have we reached the level of decay in decency where it's acceptable to publicly post photo shopped pictures of easily identifiable people with references to their name and accuse them of being a pedophile? Is this an acceptable use of the forum?
I looked at your report. I have no idea who it is nor do I see any reference to a name. Since you know whose picture was photoshopped, it doesn’t mean everyone else here knows who it is too. I’m assuming it was published on a public forum for all to see. Did that person report it to have it removed? Honestly, I really don’t know what you want us to do. We don’t have time to “police” other sites.
The information contained in this post does not necessarily reflect the opinion of Expressobeans.com (EB) and shall not be held to limit the rights of EB under the Fair Use Doctrine or any other federal, state, or local law which may be applicable.
- ygolohcysp
- Art Expert
- Posts: 2627
- Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2014 12:57 pm
the person who posted the pics removed them from their host, problem solved. I flagged it on the 15th, if it was looked at before now you would have seen the offending content that existed on this site, not another. No one is asking you to "police" other sites.aahnutz wrote:You might as well post it. Nothing like bringing more attention to it by starting a thread about it.ygolohcysp wrote:Have we reached the level of decay in decency where it's acceptable to publicly post photo shopped pictures of easily identifiable people with references to their name and accuse them of being a pedophile? Is this an acceptable use of the forum?
I looked at your report. I have no idea who it is nor do I see any reference to a name. Since you know whose picture was photoshopped, it doesn’t mean everyone else here knows who it is too. I’m assuming it was published on a public forum for all to see. Did that person report it to have it removed? Honestly, I really don’t know what you want us to do. We don’t have time to “police” other sites.
FWIW I made the thread for exactly what you stated, to bring attention to the matter. Inaction after the post was flagged caused me concern.ygolohcysp wrote:I'm not going to put a link here, no reason to draw more attention to it. I already reported the post when I saw it but the volunteers are swamped with other things.
I saw the images in the original thread, and agree with aahnutz. Anybody who wasn't familiar with whoever that was photoshopped in would have no idea who it was. Only people who already know the person were in on the joke, and at that point, they've probably already seen what you were offended by elsewhere. All you did was call additional attention to what you were trying to remove. Having the opposite effect of what you wanted... Furthermore, the person on EB wasn't suggesting your friend was a Pedophile. The person on Facebook did. Hence aahnutz saying it's not our responsibility to police other sites...
So it goes...
- aahnutz
- EB Team
- Posts: 21776
- Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 12:00 am
- Location: Some place I'd rather not be...
Maybe next time send a PM to the mods instead of starting a thread. You’ll probably get a response sooner.ygolohcysp wrote: FWIW I made the thread for exactly what you stated, to bring attention to the matter. Inaction after the post was flagged caused me concern.
The information contained in this post does not necessarily reflect the opinion of Expressobeans.com (EB) and shall not be held to limit the rights of EB under the Fair Use Doctrine or any other federal, state, or local law which may be applicable.