Replacing damaged prints with the same numbers

General art-related discussion.
User avatar
coxgt
Art Expert
Posts: 2479
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2005 12:00 am
Location: Land of Milk and Honey

Sun Apr 06, 2008 4:16 pm

glad i dug up this discussion.
good read.
8)
NEVER DEAL WITH TOM MINARCHICK!(aka, fuedalist_tart on EBAY. HE IS A SCAM ARTIST.PM IF YOU NEED DETAILS.
Codeblue wrote:Taper has finally jumped the shark.
User avatar
Bread8
EB Team Emeritus
Posts: 16438
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2003 12:00 am
Location: D.

Sun Apr 06, 2008 7:59 pm

My thoughts on the matter haven't changed
Great words won't cover ugly actions; good frames won't save bad paintings...
User avatar
MJBuck
Art Expert
Posts: 4342
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 1:00 am
Location: Portland, OR

Mon Apr 07, 2008 10:35 am

Pretty funny line right here:
cushway wrote: Some artists, like Mark Armisnski do not number their prints. I have even often times discussed this with him, but he simply does not want to. But he only prints 00 to 200 of each usually and would NEVER reprint anything.....
:lol: :roll:

I know reprints and second editions are two different things, no need for any comments from Rene.
out and perfect.
norelation wrote:quit with the sniveling and just sell the damn poster. i don't care about your life story, we all got problems. just tell me about bent corners, or if your cat has used it for target practice.
mistersmith wrote:That means I'm going to touch you.
Post Reply