its like a flipper's Mobius striptoobs wrote:EgoDeath wrote:If they aren't numbered how will he know who to ban for flipping?Sooo he can't ban himself . . .duh ...HenryGaleWasHere wrote:APs for everyone!!hunterjax wrote:why no numbers? #doyled
The Rory Kurtz Thread
_____________
RambosRemodeler wrote:.........You're entitled to your opinion but it's wrong.
Kramerica wrote: . . . . . Also, never listen to anything rambo says.
-
- Art Connoisseur
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2014 11:00 am
I'm going to assume if an artist doesn't number the AP's it's because they have stacks of prints they are saving for a rainy day.
Zer0T0lerance00 wrote:I'm going to assume if an artist doesn't number the AP's it's because they have stacks of prints they are saving for a rainy day.
Codeblue wrote:Ya know they'll put out at least 1 "ZOMG gotta rub mah nuts on another dukes butt to get in line for it" poster.
- BENYOUNG20
- Art Expert
- Posts: 1983
- Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 10:49 pm
- Location: STL
- Contact:
Unnumbered APs....lots of complaining.....and they will still sell out instantly.
- 63schoeffling
- Art Expert
- Posts: 8253
- Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2012 10:52 am
Lulz... props to Theo for cashing in. Unlimited APs!!!
So lets examine this.
If APs are numbered its better because.........?
Plenty of artists don't number their APs. And if they don't....what is the worry?
They will print more and then sell them?
If it's a screenprint they would need to have them reprinted, which would probably cost way more than it would be worth to do.
Giclees, sure thats alot easier and possible. But you really would be hard pressed to find an artist who would secretly reprint something, just to make money on a flip.
So if you really think that Rory/Theo, Danger, Mitchell, Edmiston (on some of the AP Eyes prints) whom don't number all of their APs are doing this to....do whatever is that people think they are doing, I think its a bit of a stretch to poise the move to be a nefarious one.
If APs are numbered its better because.........?
Plenty of artists don't number their APs. And if they don't....what is the worry?
They will print more and then sell them?
If it's a screenprint they would need to have them reprinted, which would probably cost way more than it would be worth to do.
Giclees, sure thats alot easier and possible. But you really would be hard pressed to find an artist who would secretly reprint something, just to make money on a flip.
So if you really think that Rory/Theo, Danger, Mitchell, Edmiston (on some of the AP Eyes prints) whom don't number all of their APs are doing this to....do whatever is that people think they are doing, I think its a bit of a stretch to poise the move to be a nefarious one.
jkw3000 - Nobody ever really wins in this hobby.
Olly - I'm a hack asshole unable to provide you with what you want.
Gonzo's Mom- And some of you are the demons!
Olly - I'm a hack asshole unable to provide you with what you want.
Gonzo's Mom- And some of you are the demons!
New Theo cangfirmed.35mmpaul wrote:So lets examine this.
If APs are numbered its better because.........?
Plenty of artists don't number their APs. And if they don't....what is the worry?
They will print more and then sell them?
If it's a screenprint they would need to have them reprinted, which would probably cost way more than it would be worth to do.
Giclees, sure thats alot easier and possible. But you really would be hard pressed to find an artist who would secretly reprint something, just to make money on a flip.
So if you really think that Rory/Theo, Danger, Mitchell, Edmiston (on some of the AP Eyes prints) whom don't number all of their APs are doing this to....do whatever is that people think they are doing, I think its a bit of a stretch to poise the move to be a nefarious one.
RupertPupkin wrote:I live by this rule and this rule alone: people are drymounting idiots.
- 63schoeffling
- Art Expert
- Posts: 8253
- Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2012 10:52 am
If it says edition of 200.... but none are numbered, how do we know it's not 2,000 yo!?35mmpaul wrote:So lets examine this.
If APs are numbered its better because.........?
Plenty of artists don't number their APs. And if they don't....what is the worry?
They will print more and then sell them?
If it's a screenprint they would need to have them reprinted, which would probably cost way more than it would be worth to do.
Giclees, sure thats alot easier and possible. But you really would be hard pressed to find an artist who would secretly reprint something, just to make money on a flip.
So if you really think that Rory/Theo, Danger, Mitchell, Edmiston (on some of the AP Eyes prints) whom don't number all of their APs are doing this to....do whatever is that people think they are doing, I think its a bit of a stretch to poise the move to be a nefarious one.