GoBluePanic wrote:If it's not at least 36" x 37.568" I'm not interested.
really? I actually cringe if it's too big - because then the chances of me getting it framed is almost nil.
rhinomilk wrote:GoBluePanic wrote:If it's not at least 36" x 37.568" I'm not interested.
really? I actually cringe if it's too big - because then the chances of me getting it framed is almost nil.
aldobishalini wrote:rhinomilk wrote:GoBluePanic wrote:If it's not at least 36" x 37.568" I'm not interested.
really? I actually cringe if it's too big - because then the chances of me getting it framed is almost nil.
I am the same, I would rather have the piece on the smaller side... makes the detail pop more imo. In addition to easier storage, framing, etc.
RupertPupkin wrote:I live by this rule and this rule alone: people are drymounting idiots.
Codeblue wrote:aldobishalini wrote:rhinomilk wrote:GoBluePanic wrote:If it's not at least 36" x 37.568" I'm not interested.
really? I actually cringe if it's too big - because then the chances of me getting it framed is almost nil.
I am the same, I would rather have the piece on the smaller side... makes the detail pop more imo. In addition to easier storage, framing, etc.
Duke was obvs being facetious.
Users browsing this forum: bmerel and 17 guests