EB Forum

rockbridge wrote:So, is the site ever going to get fixed?

cotis wrote:

mfaith wrote:

jjttdw wrote:So I would ask you, why do you NOT trust him?

Speaking completely for myself, and not on behalf of the site or any of the other volunteers, but I can't responsibly advocate trusting someone who actively works to circumvent and sidestep well established rules of a community that he apparently wants to be a part of(?), while at the same time attacking and berating the volunteers that labor over keeping said community running. But maybe that's just me. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

hope you don't own any Kurtz prints.

FrankBooth wrote:So there wasn't even one hooker paid for with donation.

mobius006 wrote:i just want to stay signed in

whalaw wrote:Minor Update: Just letting all know that we are back in semi-regular contact with the builder/designer. At this point, members of the Board of Directors are, again, providing comments on the Beta site. After those changes are implemented, I suspect we will be opening up the Beta site to a larger audience. It's still moving at a painstakingly slow pace, but it is moving.

rockbridge wrote:

whalaw wrote:Minor Update: Just letting all know that we are back in semi-regular contact with the builder/designer. At this point, members of the Board of Directors are, again, providing comments on the Beta site. After those changes are implemented, I suspect we will be opening up the Beta site to a larger audience. It's still moving at a painstakingly slow pace, but it is moving.

Appreciate the update