Page 17 of 144

Re: post of the day

Posted: Tue May 15, 2012 6:12 am
by xN3rDx
Philpenn wrote:
joshualinn199 wrote:THIS IS NOT A SPAM..
Posted by Joshua with the vagina.

Re: post of the day

Posted: Tue May 15, 2012 6:20 am
by Philpenn
The bots are getting smarter, and closer to self realization. Then we're all doomed.

I think, therefor I am... NOT SPAM.

Re: post of the day

Posted: Tue May 15, 2012 7:50 pm
by Codeblue
preachingtotheblind wrote:
PLUSH wrote:
preachingtotheblind wrote:What is the best email address to contact to ask for a refund?

LOL, this again. Why would you ask for a refund? Not gonna flip, eh. :shock:
No a genuine mistake on my behalf to purchase, no interest in flipping. Therefore I would rather ask for a refund.

Re: post of the day

Posted: Tue May 15, 2012 7:54 pm
by shoeless
:rolling:

how did I know that was in a MBW thread?!!!

donkey

Re: post of the day

Posted: Fri May 18, 2012 3:10 pm
by GatorsCanes
LeeKaye wrote:
sixstringer wrote:Is anyone going for this?

I already have too many pictures of Hitler on the wall. Adding another one might start looking strange.

Re: post of the day

Posted: Fri May 18, 2012 4:18 pm
by GR8Dane
fredo wrote:
cjethomas wrote:Well, seeing as as I have now been refunded on 100% of my orders from them due to oversells, I would call it the worst poster site I visit. Not one of the worst. The Worst.
You sound like a shitty fisherman blaming the lake.

Re: post of the day

Posted: Fri May 18, 2012 6:28 pm
by zefarrett
Chico wrote:i work in sales. w2 last year was +150K, this year, at 87% of year goal to date and on pace for +200K
want to compare bank accounts, wives, and art portfolios?

Re: post of the day

Posted: Fri May 18, 2012 6:29 pm
by sidewaysscott
two great posts of the day. :notworthy: :clap:

Re: post of the day

Posted: Sat May 19, 2012 12:50 am
by Kdh12
GR8Dane wrote:
fredo wrote:
cjethomas wrote:Well, seeing as as I have now been refunded on 100% of my orders from them due to oversells, I would call it the worst poster site I visit. Not one of the worst. The Worst.
You sound like a shitty fisherman blaming the lake.

:notworthy:

Re: post of the day

Posted: Sat May 19, 2012 12:59 am
by parlow
mr_rugby wrote:^ I hope you break your back while you're trying to suck your own dick

Re: post of the day

Posted: Sat May 19, 2012 1:49 am
by ejg904
daviddelgadoh wrote:So I heard this is where we can compare bank accounts, wives, and art portfolios?
:clap: :clap:

Re: post of the day

Posted: Sat May 19, 2012 3:21 pm
by lobotomizer
PygmyLush wrote:-SNIP-

grow up or post a thread in anything goes aobut how much you hate the "not so hook up" hook ups in this thread. so people looking for hook up dont have to snorkel through your tears.


do somthing other than bitch about every thing some one else does, says, or sells on a public fourm about ink on paper. my 2 cents to fuel the fire hope this thread doesn't disapear
:notworthy: :clap: :pint:

Re: post of the day

Posted: Sun May 27, 2012 11:08 pm
by Codeblue
applehead wrote:
gonzo303 wrote:Fat chicks need loving too...
They sure do, and so long as they have been single and not drymounted often, and have never had kids, their putang is as tight as can be!!!! You can believe that from experience. Hot chicks get run through like the Lincoln Tunnel and its like an ice cube being thrown down a linolium floored hallway. Exact opposite for the mostly less desirable heavier women, which feel much more amazing and tight. If single men knew better, they would satisfy themselves more with heavier woman, and mixing it up every now and then. my apologies to any women on here, but men were simply not designed the same as women when in comes to commitment. I'm not superficial and i can see/imagine whatever i want, even with my eyes open, but theres no doubt from my experience that the hotter the girl, the less feeling/pleasure down there, and vice versa.

Re: post of the day

Posted: Sun May 27, 2012 11:13 pm
by Bickel
Codeblue wrote:
applehead wrote:
gonzo303 wrote:Fat chicks need loving too...
They sure do, and so long as they have been single and not drymounted often, and have never had kids, their putang is as tight as can be!!!! You can believe that from experience. Hot chicks get run through like the Lincoln Tunnel and its like an ice cube being thrown down a linolium floored hallway. Exact opposite for the mostly less desirable heavier women, which feel much more amazing and tight. If single men knew better, they would satisfy themselves more with heavier woman, and mixing it up every now and then. my apologies to any women on here, but men were simply not designed the same as women when in comes to commitment. I'm not superficial and i can see/imagine whatever i want, even with my eyes open, but theres no doubt from my experience that the hotter the girl, the less feeling/pleasure down there, and vice versa.
:rolling:

Re: post of the day

Posted: Sun May 27, 2012 11:14 pm
by mobius006
Codeblue wrote:
applehead wrote:
gonzo303 wrote:Fat chicks need loving too...
They sure do, and so long as they have been single and not drymounted often, and have never had kids, their putang is as tight as can be!!!! You can believe that from experience. Hot chicks get run through like the Lincoln Tunnel and its like an ice cube being thrown down a linolium floored hallway. Exact opposite for the mostly less desirable heavier women, which feel much more amazing and tight. If single men knew better, they would satisfy themselves more with heavier woman, and mixing it up every now and then. my apologies to any women on here, but men were simply not designed the same as women when in comes to commitment. I'm not superficial and i can see/imagine whatever i want, even with my eyes open, but theres no doubt from my experience that the hotter the girl, the less feeling/pleasure down there, and vice versa.
How was this not from the open relationships forum