EB Forum

So the glow in dark inks are on the variant only...?

middayshadows wrote:So the glow in dark inks are on the variant only...?

correct

kevkevkev wrote:the film will be rubbish anyway. too many characters that wont get nearly enough screen time. gonna be a bit like spidey 3.

From what I've heard its much better than Spiderman 3.
All the "negative reviews" aren't really negative - they're just saying it is good when it could have been great.

Anyhow, this will still be the most popular movie Stout has ever done a poster for (to date).

depends what popular means. box office success doesnt mean a good film. yes it looks good. but i thought the end of the first film was a bit predictable and not as good as the first half. his most mainstream blockbuster film poster for sure. i'd like to see the runs increase to 700. he could sell em.

645 is pretty damn close.

reel close. Should just be an open edition.

oh yeah i forgot about the variant.
i wonder if the flippers are still feeling the burn from the MS posters.

Warriors '09

Cut - 450
Uncut - 200
Variant - 100

750, for a movie he had already done a print for ... all sold within a day or so.

And now obtainable for less than face.

kevkevkev wrote:depends what popular means.

Popular = amount of people that will view it, the way I was using it anyway.
IM2 will easily have the largest audience out of all the movies hes done. Lebowski / Blade Runner / Basterds tied for next? Maybe Robocop?

daviddelgadoh wrote:

kevkevkev wrote:depends what popular means.

Popular = amount of people that will view it, the way I was using it anyway.
IM2 will easily have the largest audience out of all the movies hes done. Lebowski / Blade Runner / Basterds tied for next? Maybe Robocop?

I guess you mean movie ticket sales?
Inglourious Basterds, Blade Runner, Lebowski, etc. are more acclaimed and are cult hits, but probably had a smaller audience at first. Except IB - that one seemed pretty popular.

I'm perfectly okay with this run size. It was too difficult to get my hands on a "The Thing" or "Bladerunner" ...

s_k_y wrote:Movie isn't getting good reviews...doesn't take away from the cool poster but still...

Wondering if it gets panned if that will chang people's ISO. I know I wouldn't hang a poster for a sh*tty movie...no matter how cool the poster is. Good work from Tyler again.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/fil ... 6551.story

i base my hangings on art alone. i have quite a few movie posters and band posters up and framed for movies I've never seen and bands ive never heard of.

kevkevkev wrote:oh yeah i forgot about the variant.
i wonder if the flippers are still feeling the burn from the MS posters.

i dunno, i got rid of my variant for $140, ended up keeping and framing the red version.

daviddelgadoh wrote:

kevkevkev wrote:the film will be rubbish anyway. too many characters that wont get nearly enough screen time. gonna be a bit like spidey 3.

From what I've heard its much better than Spiderman 3.
All the "negative reviews" aren't really negative - they're just saying it is good when it could have been great.

Anyhow, this will still be the most popular movie Stout has ever done a poster for (to date).

I think I.B. has it beat.