Page 3 of 4
Re: Baby Mama 09 Choe
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 3:51 pm
by machination
jjbehren wrote:phishbeatles wrote:Just watched Mori yesterday. Had a couple on who had twins, one was black and one was white. Two different fathers lol.
I have a friend that had step-siblings that were twins. One was black and the other white. Different fathers. Their mom was cheating on their dad with a black guy. No joke. The two on Mori, were they from Minnesota? Craig and Sally?
Maury...
Re: Baby Mama 09 Choe
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 3:53 pm
by Codeblue
My Dad loves that show.
Re: Baby Mama 09 Choe
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 5:14 pm
by woodyland
boatingbenny wrote:FAIL BIG TIME!!
True story about a friends sister:
She is white, pregnant, has a white husband for over 2 years.
On delivery day with husband and family in delivery room gives birth to a half black baby.
No one had a clue until the baby was born (except for her but was not sure).
Husband is now ex husband.
Story came out that she had a one night stand .
To top it off this all happened while attending BYU, she is Mormon!
Another hypocrite. What a surprise.
Re: Baby Mama 09 Choe
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 5:42 pm
by Random407
I know there are a FEW artists on here but it's hilarious how many people on EB judge art by the price tag. Not that this Choe piece is SUPER DEEP or anything, but you don't judge a book on the cover...why take a painting (or any other art) at purely face (surface) value.
So don't knock on first year art students when you're a buissness major, cuz you don't know fudge
Re: Baby Mama 09 Choe
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 5:52 pm
by boatingbenny
Random407 wrote:I know there are a FEW artists on here but it's hilarious how many people on EB judge art by the price tag. Not that this Choe piece is SUPER DEEP or anything, but you don't judge a book on the cover...why take a painting (or any other art) at purely face (surface) value.
So don't knock on first year art students when you're a buissness major, cuz you don't know fudge
BUISSNESS?? Sounds like you need to drop the art classes and spend some time in English class.
Re: Baby Mama 09 Choe
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 6:02 pm
by jamesgunter
Random407 wrote:I know there are a FEW artists on here but it's hilarious how many people on EB judge art by the price tag. Not that this Choe piece is SUPER DEEP or anything, but you don't judge a book on the cover...why take a painting (or any other art) at purely face (surface) value.
So don't knock on first year art students when you're a buissness major, cuz you don't know fudge
so wait... i'm confused. if you DO like this does it mean that you DO know fudge about art? ...and what if the reason you dont like this has nothing to do with the price tag?
...and im pretty sure that unlike books, judging art is all about the "cover"
Re: Baby Mama 09 Choe
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 9:54 pm
by TimothyABear
jojobadass wrote:Is this by that obama on a unicorn guy?
Not mine.
Re: Baby Mama 09 Choe
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 10:07 pm
by southerngarden
mattlew69 wrote:at first, i thought it was a new pollock phish poster.
Re: Baby Mama 09 Choe
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 12:33 am
by heavyconsumer
Re: Baby Mama 09 Choe
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 12:36 am
by heavyconsumer
I'm usually a huge fan of Choe's work, but imo, this is amongst the poorest pieces of his I've seen (even though it's only in a jpeg format, I think I can say that). Just my opinion of course, but I don't dig this piece at all.
Re: Baby Mama 09 Choe
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 1:16 am
by grub2323
mattlew69 wrote:no way thats a 2009 david choe. i see its on his blog but i just dont believe it.
Haven't you guys read his CURSIV book w/ all those illustrations and skethes!!!! this is totally 1000000% D Choe!!!!
Re: Baby Mama 09 Choe
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 2:35 am
by mattlew69
grub2323 wrote:mattlew69 wrote:no way thats a 2009 david choe. i see its on his blog but i just dont believe it.
Haven't you guys read his CURSIV book w/ all those illustrations and skethes!!!! this is totally 1000000% D Choe!!!!
i have always wanted to check out that sketch book. this painting just looks like i could paint it.
going from this.......
to this......
in 2009 is just ridiculous.
its probably just the difference between using water colors with the Jimi painting and acrylics for baby mama.
Re: Baby Mama 09 Choe
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 12:00 pm
by tourist504
Hillary Clinton and Obama.
Aw, sorry.
Re: Baby Mama 09 Choe
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 1:45 pm
by qtully
Random407 wrote:I know there are a FEW artists on here but it's hilarious how many people on EB judge art by the price tag. Not that this Choe piece is SUPER DEEP or anything, but you don't judge a book on the cover...why take a painting (or any other art) at purely face (surface) value.
So don't knock on first year art students when you're a buissness major, cuz you don't know fudge
so only artists can criticize art? and what else exactly do I have to do to determine if I do like a piece aside from look at it? touch it? whisper sweet nothings to it?
I'm guessing you're a first year "art" student who just , you know, totally had a class on this kind of thing last semester.
Re: Baby Mama 09 Choe
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 1:48 pm
by TimothyABear
