Goonies 15 Stout
Forum rules
• Posts in this forum should directly relate to the artist, art, or artwork.
• Do not post ISOs or FS/Ts in this forum section. Please use the Open Market section of the EB forums for all secondary (resale) market activity.
• Do not post details of your order process, shipping status, or condition upon arrival in this forum section. Please use the item's Release Discussion thread for this activity.
• Posts in this forum should directly relate to the artist, art, or artwork.
• Do not post ISOs or FS/Ts in this forum section. Please use the Open Market section of the EB forums for all secondary (resale) market activity.
• Do not post details of your order process, shipping status, or condition upon arrival in this forum section. Please use the item's Release Discussion thread for this activity.
-
- Art Connoisseur
- Posts: 145
- Joined: Sat Aug 17, 2013 4:03 pm
I can't remember off the top of my head. Someone had posted on Instagram that they talked to someone at Mondo, and the Mondo employee said the regulars would be an open edition. That's why I wanted to post it here - to see if anyone can back that up.
Oh well - I guess we'll learn soon enough if it is or isn't. Fingers crossed though.
Oh well - I guess we'll learn soon enough if it is or isn't. Fingers crossed though.
- SnakeEyes75
- Art Connoisseur
- Posts: 266
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2015 7:13 am
I'm glad the octopus is so prominent on the print - adds the the feeling that there was more to the adventure than what was on screen. I remember seeing or hearing about the octopus stuff back then, probably from kids that had these cards.planetexpress wrote:This. Plus the octopus is referenced in the Cyndi Lauper music video and other Goonies tie-ins from the time so most kids who saw the movie when it first came out would recognize it....dropdoctor wrote:I had goonies trading cards. The octopus was on one of them.
Trading Cards
Music Video:
Ha, is that the sound of flippers screaming or am I just imagining things...?PeePeeJones wrote:I can't remember off the top of my head. Someone had posted on Instagram that they talked to someone at Mondo, and the Mondo employee said the regulars would be an open edition. That's why I wanted to post it here - to see if anyone can back that up.
Oh well - I guess we'll learn soon enough if it is or isn't. Fingers crossed though.
I doubt it if only because Tyler says he's got some regs that he'll sell at some point, which would be amusing to see happen if the poster's still available somewhere else...that and I'd worry for the sanity of D&L's employees.
35mmpaul wrote:We are addicted to things that hurt our butts.
- mike123230
- Art Expert
- Posts: 5786
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2004 1:00 am
- Location: Houston, TX
Not it goddamn wouldn't.kyler4444 wrote:That would be pretty cool.
My F/S Thread: http://forum.expressobeans.com/viewtopi ... 0&t=165165
- SnakeEyes75
- Art Connoisseur
- Posts: 266
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2015 7:13 am
That's what it should be - this is a 30 year old movie with a couple generations of fans, lot of people would want this thingPeePeeJones wrote:I read on Instagram that someone mentioned that the regulars would be an open edition. Can anyone confirm this?
- mike123230
- Art Expert
- Posts: 5786
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2004 1:00 am
- Location: Houston, TX
Go to Spencer's. Is that still a store? Hot Topic? Wherever the kids buy their posters these days.SnakeEyes75 wrote:That's what it should be - this is a 30 year old movie with a couple generations of fans, lot of people would want this thingPeePeeJones wrote:I read on Instagram that someone mentioned that the regulars would be an open edition. Can anyone confirm this?
My F/S Thread: http://forum.expressobeans.com/viewtopi ... 0&t=165165
It's a screenprint - making this an open edition of thousands isn't a matter of rarity (though that's something I know some folks value), it's also a matter of practicality. Anybody with a Moss TDKR timed edition can speak for how it's not easy to keep a handle on QC for print runs hitting the 9000s...
35mmpaul wrote:We are addicted to things that hurt our butts.
- SnakeEyes75
- Art Connoisseur
- Posts: 266
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2015 7:13 am
Sorry am I ruining this for you? Yeah they should only make 10 of em you're right. Also, this is a poster for a kids moviemike123230 wrote:Go to Spencer's. Is that still a store? Hot Topic? Wherever the kids buy their posters these days.SnakeEyes75 wrote:That's what it should be - this is a 30 year old movie with a couple generations of fans, lot of people would want this thingPeePeeJones wrote:I read on Instagram that someone mentioned that the regulars would be an open edition. Can anyone confirm this?
- RambosRemodeler
- Art Freak
- Posts: 18172
- Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2012 5:35 pm
Yeah that's not happening. Dream big thoughjkw3000 wrote:Kinda important who that "someone" is...PeePeeJones wrote:I read on Instagram that someone mentioned that the regulars would be an open edition. Can anyone confirm this?
choke wrote:I won't give up a flip that I can get myself to someone who is convinced they need it. None of us need any of this fudge. It's art. It's not medicine.
- SnakeEyes75
- Art Connoisseur
- Posts: 266
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2015 7:13 am
Did it really hit above 9000? Didn't think that movie was that popular. The Mad Max this summer was what 2750 or so? Either way, just an unsubstantiated rumor at this pointjkw3000 wrote:It's a screenprint - making this an open edition of thousands isn't a matter of rarity (though that's something I know some folks value), it's also a matter of practicality. Anybody with a Moss TDKR timed edition can speak for how it's not easy to keep a handle on QC for print runs hitting the 9000s...
- mike123230
- Art Expert
- Posts: 5786
- Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2004 1:00 am
- Location: Houston, TX
You're not ruining anything for me. Just saying why it won't happen. That plus the already-mentioned QC issues. But #dreambig.SnakeEyes75 wrote:Sorry am I ruining this for you? Yeah they should only make 10 of em you're right. Also, this is a poster for a kids moviemike123230 wrote:Go to Spencer's. Is that still a store? Hot Topic? Wherever the kids buy their posters these days.SnakeEyes75 wrote:That's what it should be - this is a 30 year old movie with a couple generations of fans, lot of people would want this thingPeePeeJones wrote:I read on Instagram that someone mentioned that the regulars would be an open edition. Can anyone confirm this?
My F/S Thread: http://forum.expressobeans.com/viewtopi ... 0&t=165165
Included a golden ticket (aka Moss does art for you of whatever you want). And yeah, hit over 9000.SnakeEyes75 wrote:Did it really hit above 9000? Didn't think that movie was that popular. The Mad Max this summer was what 2750 or so? Either way, just an unsubstantiated rumor at this pointjkw3000 wrote:It's a screenprint - making this an open edition of thousands isn't a matter of rarity (though that's something I know some folks value), it's also a matter of practicality. Anybody with a Moss TDKR timed edition can speak for how it's not easy to keep a handle on QC for print runs hitting the 9000s...
The point isn't that it's not a nice thought, it's that the specific medium - screenprinting - is really built as a finite one. Reburned screens, remixing inks, it's not like doing a ton of lithos or giclees. Daniel Danger's one of the few guys who does open editions of stuff and he has to get those done in batches because they can't just print to order, and Stout would probably clock in pretty high on name alone. Even if they could get the sign off to do it (which I'd doubt because licensing is generally not friendly to this hobby), locking down a place like D&L to make them on command is not realistic since that'd screw D&L up with the rest of the stuff they have to print, and outsourcing that would be a whole other set of problems.
Not trying to be a buzzkill, there's just a reason why it's really, really hard to believe that rumor.
35mmpaul wrote:We are addicted to things that hurt our butts.
- SnakeEyes75
- Art Connoisseur
- Posts: 266
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2015 7:13 am
Nah no buzzkill. Interesting stuff, didn't know screenprinting was that time intensive, but now that I think about it, looking at the stuff I have, it would make sense. Seems like Mondo regularly uses D&L, they ever use others?jkw3000 wrote:Included a golden ticket (aka Moss does art for you of whatever you want). And yeah, hit over 9000.SnakeEyes75 wrote:Did it really hit above 9000? Didn't think that movie was that popular. The Mad Max this summer was what 2750 or so? Either way, just an unsubstantiated rumor at this pointjkw3000 wrote:It's a screenprint - making this an open edition of thousands isn't a matter of rarity (though that's something I know some folks value), it's also a matter of practicality. Anybody with a Moss TDKR timed edition can speak for how it's not easy to keep a handle on QC for print runs hitting the 9000s...
The point isn't that it's not a nice thought, it's that the specific medium - screenprinting - is really built as a finite one. Reburned screens, remixing inks, it's not like doing a ton of lithos or giclees. Daniel Danger's one of the few guys who does open editions of stuff and he has to get those done in batches because they can't just print to order, and Stout would probably clock in pretty high on name alone. Even if they could get the sign off to do it, locking down a place like D&L to make them on command is not realistic since that'd screw D&L up with the rest of the stuff they want printed, and outsourcing that would be a whole other set of problems.
Not trying to be a buzzkill, there's just a reason why it's really, really hard to believe that rumor.
They do, but some artists like working with certain printers - Horkey uses Burlesque and Ben LaFond there KILLS it on his work. Heck their instagram was all about overnighting the work they had to do to get Inclusion done. It's just a risk because it's doing the same art in different batches - they had Durieux's BTTF1 print done at a different place than 2 for his show in 2013, and while they did a fine job (I mean lord knows I like the print), it also ended up being a half inch larger than the others and 25 had a metallic ink misprint.
35mmpaul wrote:We are addicted to things that hurt our butts.