Thats all they do.ZoSoTim wrote:I hadn't seen the D&C print before I bought the Fast Times prints and while I still like them it is disappointing to see that they just ripped off an old poster. Not usually a Blunt Graffix fan (have an cool VH print they did) but this one caught my eye. I guess I know why I liked it so much now.
Fast Times at Ridgemont High 13 Dye
Forum rules
• Posts in this forum should directly relate to the artist, art, or artwork.
• Do not post ISOs or FS/Ts in this forum section. Please use the Open Market section of the EB forums for all secondary (resale) market activity.
• Do not post details of your order process, shipping status, or condition upon arrival in this forum section. Please use the item's Release Discussion thread for this activity.
• Posts in this forum should directly relate to the artist, art, or artwork.
• Do not post ISOs or FS/Ts in this forum section. Please use the Open Market section of the EB forums for all secondary (resale) market activity.
• Do not post details of your order process, shipping status, or condition upon arrival in this forum section. Please use the item's Release Discussion thread for this activity.
- Moonduckie78
- Art Connoisseur
- Posts: 145
- Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2011 7:43 pm
- Location: Florida
Come on......you can't F*CK with DARTH CHOCOLATE.......that sh*t is awesome.
I liked his 2001 print, too.
I liked his 2001 print, too.
I have to admit, I am glad to have one of the 2001 prints but it is still just a screen of someone else's work. I would like to get my hands on the variant at some point though.Moonduckie78 wrote:Come on......you can't F*CK with DARTH CHOCOLATE.......that sh*t is awesome.
I liked his 2001 print, too.
When I'm done ranting about elite power that rules the planet under a totalitarian government that uses the media to keep people stupid, my throat gets parched. That's why I drink Orange Drink. - BH
sweet jeesus
fackin shameless hack
Frank should set Eddie on him
"Just because you have Illustrator doesn't mean you are one." - VonDada
http://www.gigposters.com/forums/poster ... oster.html
http://www.gigposters.com/forums/poster ... oster.html
-
- Art Enthusiast
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2013 8:36 pm
- Lifeisghood
- Art Enthusiast
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 10:47 pm
Im gonna catch a ton of fudge im sure but im a huge kozik fan and i love his Dazed & Confused poster but i gotta admit i really am digging Dye's Fast Times poster, those movies are in the same vein to me to i think its kinda cool that he threw a tribute out to kozik with this.
laugh hard, its a long way to the bank.
-
- Art Expert
- Posts: 1355
- Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 12:00 am
I think the only fudge you'll catch is for calling it a tribute.
Lifeisghood wrote:Im gonna catch a ton of fudge im sure but im a huge kozik fan and i love his Dazed & Confused poster but i gotta admit i really am digging Dye's Fast Times poster, those movies are in the same vein to me to i think its kinda cool that he threw a tribute out to kozik with this.
Well, duh. Of course it's a tribute to Frank Kozik. People need some perspective.
The more art you study (and I don't mean just screen prints) the more you see that everything is a copy of a copy. It's all been done.
The posters of the 60's (Wes Wilson, Victor Moscoso etc) are clearly a huge influence on Chuck Sperry, as well as the work of Alphonse Mucha and others. He knows it and we all should. If you don't know your art history, you're doomed to believe everything you see is original. Or worse, should be. I see Gustav Klimt in much of the Malleus production. So what? So what if contemporary artists reimagine the art of the masters? It deepens the experience.
Andy Warhol copied a lot of material, brilliantly, in most cases. He started a conversation.
Bob Peak, John Alvin, Frank Frazetta and Richard Amsel's fantastic movie poster work has been used over and over again in the screen print world.
Nothing Tyler Stout has produced hasn't already been done (design elements) by one of the aforementioned artists.
Relax, enjoy the art. Nobody is ripping anyone off.
The more art you study (and I don't mean just screen prints) the more you see that everything is a copy of a copy. It's all been done.
The posters of the 60's (Wes Wilson, Victor Moscoso etc) are clearly a huge influence on Chuck Sperry, as well as the work of Alphonse Mucha and others. He knows it and we all should. If you don't know your art history, you're doomed to believe everything you see is original. Or worse, should be. I see Gustav Klimt in much of the Malleus production. So what? So what if contemporary artists reimagine the art of the masters? It deepens the experience.
Andy Warhol copied a lot of material, brilliantly, in most cases. He started a conversation.
Bob Peak, John Alvin, Frank Frazetta and Richard Amsel's fantastic movie poster work has been used over and over again in the screen print world.
Nothing Tyler Stout has produced hasn't already been done (design elements) by one of the aforementioned artists.
Relax, enjoy the art. Nobody is ripping anyone off.