Never stopped anyone from trying beforepetenice wrote:It has the bands name on it, therefore he can't profit/sell them.
Phish Northerly Island 13 Not Pollock
Forum rules
• Posts in this forum should directly relate to the artist, art, or artwork.
• Do not post ISOs or FS/Ts in this forum section. Please use the Open Market section of the EB forums for all secondary (resale) market activity.
• Do not post details of your order process, shipping status, or condition upon arrival in this forum section. Please use the item's Release Discussion thread for this activity.
• Posts in this forum should directly relate to the artist, art, or artwork.
• Do not post ISOs or FS/Ts in this forum section. Please use the Open Market section of the EB forums for all secondary (resale) market activity.
• Do not post details of your order process, shipping status, or condition upon arrival in this forum section. Please use the item's Release Discussion thread for this activity.
-
biscocrack420
- Art Expert
- Posts: 5927
- Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2009 2:29 pm
-
electrachrome
- Site Admin
- Posts: 18199
- Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2004 12:00 am
- Location: Boston
they are always given away by Not Pollock...I heard some may have been given to WaterWheel to sell.petenice wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong, but Not Pollock prints are not for profit, therefore given away or bartered? It has the bands name on it, therefore he can't profit/sell them.
they may have been printed in Jim's studio, or maybe one was dropped off at Jim's open studio before the show.DeliStyle wrote:Not Pollock is made by Pollock???? I'm very confused by this image.
Jim is not Not Pollock.
It makes sense now. Thank you. I know he opened up the studio on Saturday, anyone go? Any new prints?electrachrome wrote:they are always given away by Not Pollock...I heard some may have been given to WaterWheel to sell.petenice wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong, but Not Pollock prints are not for profit, therefore given away or bartered? It has the bands name on it, therefore he can't profit/sell them.
they may have been printed in Jim's studio, or maybe one was dropped off at Jim's open studio before the show.DeliStyle wrote:Not Pollock is made by Pollock???? I'm very confused by this image.
Jim is not Not Pollock.
-
electrachrome
- Site Admin
- Posts: 18199
- Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2004 12:00 am
- Location: Boston
2 new prints...kinda weird, even for Pollock.DeliStyle wrote: I know he opened up the studio on Saturday, anyone go? Any new prints?
squid playing cards and a crab holding the Stanley Cup
-
electrachrome
- Site Admin
- Posts: 18199
- Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2004 12:00 am
- Location: Boston
you can see them here:DeliStyle wrote:Is the squid the one someone took a picture of a posted below the not pollock? I like that one
http://forum.expressobeans.com/viewtopi ... 9#p2184489
-
DreadiebettieFlips
- Member
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 5:31 am
petenice wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong, but Not Pollock prints are not for profit, therefore given away or bartered? It has the bands name on it, therefore he can't profit/sell them.
Never stopped people from selling them for $500 on eBay! Missed it. But still $500 for a not pollock. Guess he dropped it in pollocks city!
-
attackonthebass
- Art Expert
- Posts: 1564
- Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 6:05 pm
- Contact:
I'm not sure if it was a fake or what but I recently just saw one of these up for sale but it had a TON of paper around the edge of the print. It looked weird right when I saw it & when I looked back here the edges were all nice & trimmed. I wish I remember where I saw that image so I could post an image of it here.automator wrote:New image Phish Northerly Island 13 Not Pollock
Wedding Gift from our favorite secret artist.
Common sense, is not that common
-
electrachrome
- Site Admin
- Posts: 18199
- Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2004 12:00 am
- Location: Boston
that's the new MK Ultra edition. the files were made public and an "entity" named MK Ultra printed up a new edition in multiple color ways. As far as it's 'authenticity' is concerned ...it's a bootleg/second printing with multiple unknown variants and has been given the 'blessing' of Not Pollock.attackonthebass wrote:I'm not sure if it was a fake or what but I recently just saw one of these up for sale but it had a TON of paper around the edge of the print. It looked weird right when I saw it & when I looked back here the edges were all nice & trimmed. I wish I remember where I saw that image so I could post an image of it here.
not Pollock wrote: Please to made aware that this print of the poster of the image of the Not Pollock “Knot Pollock” is not an official print of Not Pollock but the respect is made for the efforts of the printer to have the prints made printed.
not Pollock wrote:Please to make the understanding being made that the authorization is made implicit for the maximization of the enjoyment of the piece and in this case the printing of the piece has been made more vibrant and meaningful.Looks like someone ripped off Not Pollock and reprinted it without authorization.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_MKUltra