It's almost like the Croatoan haters can't access the art comments, where people have been clamoring for that print for like 7 years. And when it does come, it's world class, and embossed, and better than anyone hoped. fudge, go back through the "show us your desktop" thread, Croatoan has been, and still is, my desktop wallpaper for years.
Who gives a fudge that the original painting wasn't done in '14 -- the art print edition was, and that's what people voted for.
EB Forum
Art discussion forum.
EBeans AoTY / PoTY / CPoTY voting is live
by mistersmith on Thu Jan 22, 2015 2:46 am
-
mistersmith - Art Freak
- Status: Active
- Posts: 13557
- Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2007 5:09 am
- Location: SF, CA
electrachrome, mostly kidding wrote:mr smith, EB's poet laureate.
Take this man at his word:
misterx wrote:Don't enter into discourse with me.
by shoeless on Thu Jan 22, 2015 2:55 am
Never had a Hork.
Wanted a Nesting for a minute.
Just not my kind of art.....
but Croatoan looks pretty darn good (from pics Ive seen).
Obviously didn't get my vote for POTY, but I think it's deserved!
Wanted a Nesting for a minute.
Just not my kind of art.....
but Croatoan looks pretty darn good (from pics Ive seen).
Obviously didn't get my vote for POTY, but I think it's deserved!
-
shoeless - Art Expert
- Status: Active
- Posts: 4702
- Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 6:10 pm
- Location: Nashville
fnord wrote:If you like something, for the love of dog don't share it with EB.
by stefansf on Thu Jan 22, 2015 2:59 am
By your logic, artists should start producing giclee versions of art they created 5-10 years ago - and win an award for it, for the recycled art. You are aware this is not even a screen print? Nobody cares if you have been stroking off to this thing for seven years. It's really a travesty this was ever allowed to compete with art that was produced in 2014.
If the Horkey fanboys could only see how incredibly biased they are, you guys are just rigging the system. It's really a slap in the face to the other artists. Shame.
If the Horkey fanboys could only see how incredibly biased they are, you guys are just rigging the system. It's really a slap in the face to the other artists. Shame.
mistersmith wrote:It's almost like the Croatoan haters can't access the art comments, where people have been clamoring for that print for like 7 years. And when it does come, it's world class, and embossed, and better than anyone hoped. fudge, go back through the "show us your desktop" thread, Croatoan has been, and still is, my desktop wallpaper for years.
Who gives a fudge that the original painting wasn't done in '14 -- the art print edition was, and that's what people voted for.
-
stefansf - Art Connoisseur
- Status: Active
- Posts: 304
- Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2012 4:53 pm
- Location: Phoenix, AZ & San Francisco, CA
by shoeless on Thu Jan 22, 2015 3:03 am
Didn't realize how serious this EB award was....
Have we looked into possible bribery?
Have we looked into possible bribery?
-
shoeless - Art Expert
- Status: Active
- Posts: 4702
- Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 6:10 pm
- Location: Nashville
fnord wrote:If you like something, for the love of dog don't share it with EB.
by Kramerica on Thu Jan 22, 2015 3:05 am
If it's art print of the year, and the print was created in 2014, what's the big deal? Seems like it fits the criteria.
-
Kramerica - Art Freak
- Status: Active
- Posts: 12945
- Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2012 11:37 am
- Location: Corner of 1st & 1st
When I'm done ranting about elite power that rules the planet under a totalitarian government that uses the media to keep people stupid, my throat gets parched. That's why I drink Orange Drink. - BH
by 1000steps on Wed Jan 28, 2015 10:06 am
fredo wrote:1000steps wrote: EB...is based entirely on jpegs...
Are you including all the photos taken of the actual prints?
It's not about me. The EB award winners are chosen by examining BOTH photos of actual prints and digital images. No one can objectively judge pieces of art based on an amalgam of different image types.
Don't get me wrong - I am sure many people believe they can effectively interpret skewed data. Reality and experience imply otherwise.
-
1000steps - Art Expert
- Status: Active
- Posts: 3542
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 11:20 pm
Rick_a_c wrote:It's the game. Ya play or ya don't.
by jrsheppa on Wed Jan 28, 2015 4:49 pm
1000steps wrote:fredo wrote:1000steps wrote: EB...is based entirely on jpegs...
Are you including all the photos taken of the actual prints?
It's not about me. The EB award winners are chosen by examining BOTH photos of actual prints and digital images. No one can objectively judge pieces of art based on an amalgam of different image types.
Don't get me wrong - I am sure many people believe they can effectively interpret skewed data. Reality and experience imply otherwise.
Yeah, not a huge fan of the idea of a print winning something when it hasn't been printed yet, but mcnail made a good point that most people won't ever see the print in the flesh if they don't ever own one, which is a lot of people. As long as there are some in the flesh shots, I feel like people can get a good enough idea of what the print looks like to vote, in good faith, something in as POTY
-
jrsheppa - Art Expert
- Status: Active
- Posts: 5372
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 12:23 pm
- Location: The South
by RiotAct on Sat Jan 31, 2015 7:24 pm
After looking at the detail shots several lucky folks have shared, I can safely say that FoTR 100% deserved Cinema Poster of the Year.
-
RiotAct - Art Freak
- Status: Active
- Posts: 17444
- Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 9:47 pm
- Location: Buffalo, NY
1000steps wrote:Gift payments are like unprotected sex - always a bad idea with strangers... If you are gonna do it, do it with someone you trust absolutely.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests