Bikejoh wrote:I think it should be the best artwork created in 2014. Money printing rereleases of older artwork shouldn't be eligible. Didn't it have its chance in 2006?
Bikejoh wrote:Timbrh2001 wrote:"lowbrow"
What, anything besides Horkey?
wonkabars7 wrote:CPoTY could be a handy marketing tool, a line added to those ebay auctions amirite?
jjbehren wrote:However, do those people making that argument only vote for pieces that they've actually seen in real life?
RupertPupkin wrote:I live by this rule and this rule alone: people are drymounting idiots.
jjbehren wrote:However, do those people making that argument only vote for pieces that they've actually seen in real life?
Rick_a_c wrote:It's the game. Ya play or ya don't.
1000steps wrote:jjbehren wrote:However, do those people making that argument only vote for pieces that they've actually seen in real life?
This comment has changed my outlook entirely. Most jpegs of prints suck compared to the actual print, I think we can agree, but not on a consistent and regular basis across the many prints released in a year. This means that one cannot judge art effectively based on jpeg images, so the EB voting, which is based entirely on jpegs is essentially meaningless. People are judging based on a hodgepodge of impressions of both jpegs and real-life experiences, which inevitably skews the results. The EB awards have little actual meaning, QED.
Thank you. One less thing to care about.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest